Kyzatrex vs Maximus Native T

busydad

New Member
Is there any real difference between these 2 forms of oral testosterone? Do they have different half-life's? Does one seem more effective? I'm taking Maximus oral T at the moment 800 mg in the morning. I've been thinking about splitting the dose to 400 in the morning and 400 around lunch time. It seems like this is the normal dosing routine for the Kyzatrex, and I'm wondering if it will also work with the Native-T
 
They are not the same thing. Native testosterone is simply testosterone without chemical modification. Testosterone undecanoate modifies testosterone by attaching the undecanoate ester.

Cue someone rushing to reply, "but testosterone undecanoate yields the same bioidentical testosterone molecule when the body removes the ester!" Sure, but until that happens, it's a different molecule with different behavior, otherwise known as "not the same thing".

The half lives are comparable. Testosterone undecanoate is associated with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal complaints. Efficacy is similar.

It seems like this is the normal dosing routine for the Kyzatrex, and I'm wondering if it will also work with the Native-T
This scenario would require you to obtain multiple prescriptions for the same schedule III substance from multiple providers. Bad things happen at many levels (legal, medical, insurance, provider trust) when you get caught doing this, so no, these different forms of testosterone do NOT work together.


Maximus has done a bit of a disservice IMO with the "Native T" terminology.
Native testosterone is the term found in the published studies that exist using oral testosterone base. We did not coin the term ourselves. Maximus is an evidence-based, "follow the science" type of organization, so taking our cues from medical literature is the only coherent option for us.
 
Last edited:
...
Cue someone rushing to reply, "but testosterone undecanoate yields the same bioidentical testosterone molecule when the body removes the ester!" Sure, but until that happens, it's a different molecule with different behavior, otherwise known as "not the same thing".

The half lives are comparable. Testosterone undecanoate is associated with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal complaints. Efficacy is similar.
...

Let's ask a different question then. Aside from the possible GI link, have any clinically significant differences been found? If not then the whole "native T" thing still seems like marketing obfuscation to me.
 
Let's ask a different question then. Aside from the possible GI link, have any clinically significant differences been found? If not then the whole "native T" thing still seems like marketing obfuscation to me.
Here's your question as I read it: aside from clinically significant differences in side effects, have clinically significant differences been found?

Yes, there are also differences in fasted absorption, and the amount of DHT that results, where native testosterone produces a lower DHT:T ratio then oral TU: https://academic.oup.com/ejendo/article/185/5/607/6654354
 
They are not the same thing. Native testosterone is simply testosterone without chemical modification. Testosterone undecanoate modifies testosterone by attaching the undecanoate ester.

Cue someone rushing to reply, "but testosterone undecanoate yields the same bioidentical testosterone molecule when the body removes the ester!" Sure, but until that happens, it's a different molecule with different behavior, otherwise known as "not the same thing".

The half lives are comparable. Testosterone undecanoate is associated with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal complaints. Efficacy is similar.


This scenario would require you to obtain multiple prescriptions for the same schedule III substance from multiple providers. Bad things happen at many levels (legal, medical, insurance, provider trust) when you get caught doing this, so no, these different forms of testosterone do NOT work together.



Native testosterone is the term found in the published studies that exist using oral testosterone base. We did not coin the term ourselves. Maximus is an evidence-based, "follow the science" type of organization, so taking our cues from medical literature is the only coherent option for us.
Then how is it different from Test-No-Ester or Test-Suspension other than being orally delivered?
 
Is there any real difference between these 2 forms of oral testosterone? Do they have different half-life's? Does one seem more effective? I'm taking Maximus oral T at the moment 800 mg in the morning. I've been thinking about splitting the dose to 400 in the morning and 400 around lunch time. It seems like this is the normal dosing routine for the Kyzatrex, and I'm wondering if it will also work with the Native-T

Oral native T is nothing new here!

Look over my reply in post # 29!





The main difference here native T is pure crystalline T unmodified as in no ester attached.

Native oral testosterone aims to deliver the unmodified (native) hormone via lymphatic pathways to bypass hepatic first-pass metabolism, similar to TU but without the ester prodrug conversion.

Maximus Tribe's oral native testosterone tablets use a lipid bilayer crystalline formulation of non-esterified T to enhance solubility and absorption.

Taken with some fat will improve absorption.

Testosterone undecanoate is pure native testosterone in crystalline form that has an undecanoate ester attached at the 17β position of the T molecule, which modifies its PK for oral use.

Chemically, it is a prodrug ester of T designed for better oral bioavailability, as unmodified T is poorly absorbed and rapidly metabolized by the liver when taken orally.

The newer oral TU formulations (Jatenzo, Tlando and Kyzatrex) let alone Andriol the granddaddy which has been in use/available on the market for decades were designed to be absorbed through the lymphatic system thus bypassing the destructive first pass through the liver.

Oral TU (Andriol) was introduced to the market in the 70s and was the go to oral T for testosterone replacement as it is non-alkylated and was considered a safe non-hepatotoxic oral androgen for long term substitution in men suffering from hypogonadism.

It was on the market in Canada for decades.

Still on the market in many countries and was the only oral T available in Canada up until recently as it was discontinued in 2018 and replaced with a generic oral TU.

The first of the newer oral formulations of testosterone Jatenzo was approved by the US FDA back in 2019.

Jatenzo was the first non-c17 alpha alkylated oral available on the US market.

Other formulations of oral TU such as Tlando and Kyzatrex were released in 2022.

Again native oral T aims to deliver the unmodified (native) hormone via lymphatic pathways to bypass hepatic first-pass metabolism, similar to TU but without the ester prodrug conversion.

The PKs (oral native T vs oral TU) are not identical as oral TU formulations require hydrolysis by esterases to release active T, leading to delayed and more variable absorption compared to native T.

Due to the slow lymphatic absorption and gradual release/hydrolysis of active T, half-life of serum T concentrations is 8-12 hrs.

The newer oral TU formulations (Jatenzo, Tlando and Kyzatrex) are dose twice-daily due to the PK as there will be a gradual rise resulting in 2 daily fairly short-lived peaks followed by a gradual decline resulting in 2 troughs (close to baseline) and would be more suppressive to the hpta.

Tmax oral TU is achieved 4-5 hours post dose.

Standard starting dose Kyzatrex 200 mg BID as many men can achieve stellar peak TT and more importantly FT levels.

Others will not respond well on the starting dose and will need 300-400 mg BID in order too achieve a high peak T.

No need to jump in on the higher starting dose 300-400 mg BID as you may be one who achieves stellar levels.

Even then steady-state is achieved within a week so you can always bump up the dose fairly quick if you do not hit a high enough peak on the starting dose 200 mg BID.

Maximus oral native T is dosed once daily 600-800 mg and absorbed rapidly with a swift peak in T and a faster decline returning near baseline by 8 hrs.

Once daily dosing and the overall PK profile would result in less suppression of the hpta.










* different routes of administration for testosterone have been used and native testosterone replacement therapy has been licensed as implants, transdermal, transbuccal, and intranasal therapies (5).


* Testosterone undecanoate (TU) is an ester prodrug of testosterone and has a mid-chain length fatty acid at the 17β position and when given orally undergoes absorption in part through the intestinal lymphatic pathway, so circumventing some of the first-pass metabolism through the liver (4). Oral testosterone undecanoate is presented as an oily capsule and has been available in Europe since the 1970s (1); however, TU has to be taken with a meal two or three times daily, has an unpredictable absorption pattern, and generates high dihydrotestosterone (DHT) to testosterone ratio (8-10). An oral self-emulsifying formulation of TU has recently been approved in the US (Jatenzo®, Clarus Therapeutics Inc., USA). The formulation promotes solubilization and intestinal lymphatic absorption of the lipophilic testosterone ester. Deesterification of TU by nonspecific esterases in liver, blood, and tissue results in the production of testosterone. The liberated undecanoic acid moiety is metabolized via beta-oxidation. 5-Alpha reduction of testosterone undecanoate in the gut produces dihydrotestosterone undecanoate (DHTU) and DHT (11). The testosterone undecanoate formulation has to be taken with food, patients have higher than normal DHT levels on treatment and the label is associated with a black box warning regarding an increase in blood pressure (12). These data support the need for new developments in this area.


* oral formulations of the ester, testosterone undecanoate (TU), require a meal for absorption and generate supraphysiological dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels.


* Various oral formulations of native testosterone have been tested in man although none have been licensed (13-20). Soon after testosterone’s identification and characterization, oral testosterone administration was disregarded as a viable route of administration and replacement because of poor oral absorption (21). In the 1970s, a micronized form of free testosterone was demonstrated to be absorbed in hypogonadal men but absorption was not reliable enough to progress as therapy (14). Further research, particularly by Amory and coworkers, showed that native testosterone administered as a suspension in oil, provided potentially therapeutic levels of testosterone in healthy men (15), and combined with 5αreductase inhibitors provided physiological testosterone levels both in the fasted and fed state (16). Native testosterone is practically insoluble in water and in fatty oil vehicles (22), and the challenge has been to develop a solution formulation that contains sufficient testosterone concentration to provide reproducible physiological testosterone levels in hypogonadal men. Building upon the previous observations, we have developed a lipidic solution formulation of native testosterone and have tested it in dogs and humans in the fasted and fed state.




Testosterone was isolated, named, and synthesized in 1935 (1), but to date, no oral native testosterone has been licensed for testosterone replacement therapy.
The reason being that oral native testosterone, although absorbed through the intestine, undergoes extensive pre-systemic metabolism along the gastrointestinal tract (2), as well as rapid first-pass metabolism in the liver (3). The oral absorption of testosterone is also dependent on the dosing vehicle, wherein a lipophilic vehicle may increase the proportion of testosterone absorbed via the lymphatic route (4). It is thus difficult to achieve adequate bioavailability of testosterone in order to maintain consistent physiological testosterone levels via the oral route.
To address this, different routes of administration for testosterone have been used and native testosterone replacement therapy has been licensed as implants, transdermal, transbuccal, and intranasal therapies (5).








\


* Diurnal’s DITEST™ product is a formulation of unmodified testosterone that seeks to avoid the issues of poor bioavailability by using a proprietary, oil-based excipient mixture




About native oral testosterone

Native oral testosterone (DNL-0300 previously referred to as DITEST™) is a novel formulation developed by Diurnal comprising native testosterone adapted for oral delivery for the treatment of hypogonadism.The main challenge with oral delivery of native testosterone is that, whilst the hormone undergoes rapid and complete absorption, there is considerable metabolism in both the gut wall and during the first hepatic pass which accounts for up to 98% reduction in testosterone bioavailability (the amount of drug in the body that is able to have an active effect). Diurnal's approach is a proprietary lipid-based formulation that aims to provide improved bioavailability of testosterone. An additional potential feature of the native testosterone formulation demonstrated in both preclinical studies and now in this clinical study is that it shows similar absorption and bioavailability in both the fed and fasted state and therefore potentially can be taken without a substantial meal, which is a requirement with many alternative oral modified-testosterone formulations. Patents protecting DNL-0300 have already been granted in the US, Europe, and other major territories worldwide.
 
Here's your question as I read it: aside from clinically significant differences in side effects, have clinically significant differences been found?

Yes, there are also differences in fasted absorption, and the amount of DHT that results, where native testosterone produces a lower DHT:T ratio then oral TU: https://academic.oup.com/ejendo/article/185/5/607/6654354

Did you forget already?

 
Did you forget already?

No, I was there. What point are you trying to make? Not one of us emerged from the womb knowing what native testosterone was, not even you good buddy.
 
No, I was there. What point are you trying to make? Not one of us emerged from the womb knowing what native testosterone was, not even you good buddy.

I ws referring to to the paper I posted in my reply!

You know the one you posted the link to in post #7!


 
Here's your question as I read it: aside from clinically significant differences in side effects, have clinically significant differences been found?

Yes, there are also differences in fasted absorption, and the amount of DHT that results, where native testosterone produces a lower DHT:T ratio then oral TU: https://academic.oup.com/ejendo/article/185/5/607/6654354

The improved DHT:T ratio has been below my radar. It's a selling point for me, given my general preference for staying in the confines of normal physiology. There may not be much specific evidence of harm in an elevated ratio, but I'd say the burden of proof should be on those defending the non-physiological.

Ok, I admit that "New and improved DHT:T ratio!" is not a very sexy marketing slogan.
 

hCG Mixing Calculator

HCG Mixing Protocol Calculator

TRT Hormone Predictor Widget

TRT Hormone Predictor

Predict estradiol, DHT, and free testosterone levels based on total testosterone

⚠️ Medical Disclaimer

This tool provides predictions based on statistical models and should NOT replace professional medical advice. Always consult with your healthcare provider before making any changes to your TRT protocol.

ℹ️ Input Parameters

Normal range: 300-1000 ng/dL

Predicted Hormone Levels

Enter your total testosterone value to see predictions

Results will appear here after calculation

Understanding Your Hormones

Estradiol (E2)

A form of estrogen produced from testosterone. Important for bone health, mood, and libido. Too high can cause side effects; too low can affect well-being.

DHT

Dihydrotestosterone is a potent androgen derived from testosterone. Affects hair growth, prostate health, and masculinization effects.

Free Testosterone

The biologically active form of testosterone not bound to proteins. Directly available for cellular uptake and biological effects.

Scientific Reference

Lakshman KM, Kaplan B, Travison TG, Basaria S, Knapp PE, Singh AB, LaValley MP, Mazer NA, Bhasin S. The effects of injected testosterone dose and age on the conversion of testosterone to estradiol and dihydrotestosterone in young and older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Aug;95(8):3955-64.

DOI: 10.1210/jc.2010-0102 | PMID: 20534765 | PMCID: PMC2913038

Online statistics

Members online
5
Guests online
327
Total visitors
332

Latest posts

Beyond Testosterone Podcast

Back
Top