Gynecomastia, Male Breast Cancer, and Beyond

Buy Lab Tests Online

madman

Super Moderator
Getting real deep here!


TEACHING POINTS

*In the appropriate clinical setting, mammography is diagnostic for gynecomastia, which is the most common reason for presentation with a palpable lump, an area of focal pain, or breast enlargement; and mammography is highly sensitive in the male breast due to the typically lower amount of fibroglandular tissue compared with that in women.

*Although ductal and stromal proliferation in these patients may be extensive, males with gynecomastia rarely have substantial lobular proliferation due to a lack of progesterone.

*Gynecomastia is the most common cause of presentation with an area of palpable concern, breast pain, or breast enlargement in men.

*Axillary US should be performed in all male patients with breast masses suspicious for cancer because approximately one-half of MBCs involve the axillary lymph nodes.

*Papillary carcinoma has been reported to be twice as prevalent in patients with MBC than in those with FBC. This is thought to be due to the predominantly larger ducts that make up typical male breast tissue, in which these neoplasms tend to occur.


gynecomastia pictures excelmale.jpg


The number of men undergoing breast imaging has increased in recent years, according to some reports. Most male breast concerns are related to benign causes, most commonly gynecomastia. The range of abnormalities typically encountered in the male breast is less broad than that encountered in women, given that lobule formation rarely occurs in men. Other benign causes of male breast palpable abnormalities with characteristic imaging findings include lipomas, sebaceous or epidermal inclusion cysts, and intramammary lymph nodes. Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare, representing up to 1% of breast cancer cases, but some data indicate that its incidence is increasing. MBC demonstrates some clinical features that overlap with those of gynecomastia, including a propensity for the subareolar breast. Men with breast cancer tend to present at a later stage than do women. MBC typically has similar imaging features to those of female breast cancer, often characterized by an irregular mass that may have associated calcifications. Occasionally, however, MBC has a benign-appearing imaging phenotype, with an oval shape and circumscribed margins, and therefore most solid breast masses in men require tissue diagnosis. Histopathologic evaluation may alternatively reveal other benign breast masses found in men, including papillomas, myofibroblastomas, and hemangiomas. Radiologists must be familiar with the breadth of male breast abnormalities to meet the rising challenge of caring for these patients.




Introduction

Although the small number of men relative to women who present with breast concerns leads to difficulty in determining trends, diagnostic imaging has been reported (1,2) to have been increasingly used in recent years for evaluation of male breast concerns. Most male breast symptoms have benign causes, the majority of which are related to gynecomastia (3). Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare cause of symptoms in men, but some data indicate that its incidence is increasing (1,4–8). MBC is more likely to be diagnosed at an advanced stage than is female breast cancer (FBC) (9,10). Therefore, an expedient diagnosis of cancer in symptomatic men presenting for imaging is of the utmost importance. MBC often demonstrates suspicious imaging features similar to those of FBC but occasionally has a deceptively benign imaging appearance, which has been theorized to contribute to a delay in diagnosis of MBC (11). These facts emphasize the importance of radiologist familiarity with the spectrum of imaging findings of benign and malignant breast abnormalities in men.

This article reviews male breast development, methods of imaging and pathophysiologic characteristics of the male breast, imaging of gynecomastia, and imaging findings of MBC and benign male breast abnormalities.





Male Breast Development




Methods of Imaging the Male Breast




Gynecomastia


Gynecomastia is an increase in ductal and stromal tissue in male patients secondary to an increased ratio of estrogens to androgens (Fig 1). Gynecomastia may be physiologic (ie,related to an expected deviation from the normal hormonal balance in patients of specific age groups) or pathologic(ie, occurring when the inciting hormonal derangement is caused by extrinsic influences or intrinsic conditions resulting in a systemic increase in estrogen). Although ductal and stromal proliferation in these patients may be extensive, males with gynecomastia rarely have substantial lobular proliferation due to a lack of progesterone. Therefore, lobular abnormalities seen in women, such as fibroadenomas, phyllodes tumors, most fibrocystic changes, lobular carcinoma in situ, and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), are rarely seen in men (13,21,22).


*Physiologic gynecomastia

*Pathologic gynecomastia

*Pseudogynecomastia





Male Breast Cancer




Pathologic and Imaging Findings of MBC


*Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

*Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

*Papillary Carcinoma

*Invasive Lobular Carcinoma

*Other Male Breast Malignancies





Treatment of MBC




Benign Male Breast Entities


*Abscess

*Hemangioma

*Myofibroblastoma

*Intraductal Papilloma

*Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia

*Parenchymal Cyst

*Fibroadenoma





Breast Imaging in Transgender Patients




Breast Cancer Screening in Men at High Risk




Conclusion

A variety of breast abnormalities can be seen in men, and some entities demonstrate clinical or imaging findings specific to men in comparison to those seen in women. Gynecomastia is the most common cause of presentation for breast imaging in men, while MBC is a rare but important abnormality that must be excluded in symptomatic men. Gynecomastia and MBC share a predilection for the subareolar breast, and some cases of gynecomastia may demonstrate suspicious imaging findings similar to those of MBC, requiring biopsy. However, most cases of gynecomastia and MBC can be distinguished on the basis of other differences in clinical and imaging findings.

Other less common benign causes of male breast symptoms include abscesses, hemangiomas, myofibroblastomas,papillomas, and pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH). Because lobules generally are not present in the male breast, common benign breast masses in women such as fibroadenomas and cysts are rare in men. In addition, MBC occasionally has deceptively benign-appearing imaging features such as mostly circumscribed margins and an oval shape. Thus, most solid breast masses in men require biopsy. In a male patient with a breast mass requiring biopsy, US evaluation of the ipsilateral axilla should be performed, given the high rate of involvement of the regional lymph nodes in MBC.

Men have increasingly presented for breast imaging in recent years. MBC incidence is rising, and men with MBC typically receive the diagnosis at a later stage than do women because of delayed presentation. Radiologists must be familiar with the varied clinical and imaging findings of MBC and other causes of male breast concerns to avoid further delay in diagnosis of MBC.
 

Attachments

  • mannix-et-al-2024-imaging-the-male-breast-gynecomastia-male-breast-cancer-and-beyond.pdf
    6.3 MB · Views: 436
Defy Medical TRT clinic doctor
Figure 1. Normal breast development and gynecomastia. Illustration shows the typical development of the breasts in males and females, which diverges at puberty, when estrogen causes ductal proliferation in girls and a high level of testosterone causes atrophy of the ducts in boys. Later in female development, progesterone produced by the corpus luteum causes proliferation of the lobules in the terminal ductal lobular unit, which is the functional unit of the female breast and where FBC typically occurs. Conversely, normal male breast anatomy consists of a few sparse ducts beneath the nipple, and the components of the chest wall elsewhere (ie, skin and subcutaneous fat, nerves, blood vessels, lymphatic vessels, and underlying muscle). Gynecomastia occurs in male patients when an increased ratio of estrogens to androgens causes ductal proliferation (dotted arrow). No substantial lobular proliferation occurs in male individuals due to a lack of significant progesterone to cause this. This in turn influences the range of abnormalities typically seen in the male breast.
1719759914142.png
 
Figure 2. US techniques for evaluating the male breast. Illustration (far left) shows suboptimal positioning of the transducer for evaluation of the subareolar breast, causing the angle of the ultrasound beam to be close to parallel to the subareolar ducts, reducing the strength of the reflected beam the transducer receives to create an image, and potentially obscuring the subareolar tissue with shadowing from the nipple-areolar complex (gray “lightning bolt”). The following techniques for better visualization of the subareolar tissue are shown: (1) the peripheral compression technique (applying greater pressure on the peripheral end of the transducer to angle the probe-skin interface, (2) the rolled nipple technique(applying gentle pressure using the index finger on the opposite side of the nipple, and (3) the two-hand compression technique (gently compressing the subareolar breast between one hand and the transducer while angling the transducer vertically).
1719760149972.png
 
Figure 3. Pseudogynecomastia in a 35-year-old man with a palpable area of concern in the subareolar left breast. Bilateral mediolateral oblique (MLO) mammographic views show a diffuse increase in fatty tissue in both breasts, without an increase in ductal tissue. Subareolar density (arrow) in the left breast corresponds to the area of palpable concern as indicated by a BB skin marker (arrowhead), corresponding to a sebaceous cyst at US (not shown).
Screenshot (37457).png

Screenshot (37458).png
 
Figure 4. Nodular gynecomastia in an 18-year-old man with a palpable abnormality in the subareolar left breast. (A) MLO views of both breasts show fan-shaped subareolar dense tissue, greater on the left than on the right (arrows). The palpable area of concern on the left is indicated by a BB marker on the skin. (B) US image of the subareolar left breast shows triangular-shaped hypoechoic tissue extending from the nipple (arrow).(C) US image of the subareolar right breast shows a similar but less-pronounced appearance of the subareolar tissue (arrow), consistent with nodular gynecomastia.(D) Photomicrograph of a core needle biopsy specimen shows proliferation of periductal connective tissue with inflammation (short arrow) and mild epithelial proliferation (long arrow). (Hematoxylin-eosin [H-E]stain; original magnification, ×10.)
1719760630513.png
 
Figure 5. Dendritic gynecomastia in a 48-year-old man with a history of left mastectomy for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) who presented with a palpable abnormality and tenderness in the right breast. (A) MLO mammographic view of the right breast shows flame-shaped subareolar tissue,with projections extending posteriorly into fat (arrowheads). (B) US image shows corresponding subareolar findings initially considered suspicious for an indistinct anti parallel hypoechoic mass (long arrow),with surrounding hyperechoic tissue (short arrows). (C) However, use of scanning techniques such as the rolled nipple technique can help elongate the ducts (arrows) for better visualization, demonstrating that the findings represent benign gynecomastia.(D) Photomicrograph of dendritic gynecomastia shows hyalinized periductal stroma with associated fibrosis (short arrow) surrounding benign ducts (long arrow). (H-E stain; original magnification, ×10.)
1719760737272.png
 
Figure 6. Diffuse glandular gynecomastia in a 58-year old man with hypertension undergoing long-term treatment with spironolactone who presented with bilateral palpable breast abnormalities (arrowheads). MLO bilateral mammographic views show heterogeneously dense breast tissue in the subareolar regions of both breasts extending posteriorly, with an appearance indistinguishable from that of a mammogram in a woman. The patient underwent bilateral mastectomy, with pathologic evaluation showing bilateral gynecomastia with fibrosis and no malignancy in either breast
1719760878481.png
 
Figure 8. IDC with mucinous features in a 69-year-old man who presented with a palpable lump in the left breast. (A) Craniocaudal and MLO views of the left breast show a high-density irregular palpable subareolar left breast mass (arrowheads), with some indistinct margins, which involves the overlying skin and the nipple-areolar complex (arrows). (B) US image of the left breast shows a corresponding irregular hypoechoic mass with indistinct margins (arrow) that involves the overlying skin, which is thickened (arrowhead). (C) US image of the left axilla shows a morphologically abnormal lymph node with cortical thickening up to approximately 1 cm (calipers), with effacement of the echogenic fatty hilum (arrowhead). (D) Photomicrograph of left mastectomy specimen shows nests of tumor cells infiltrating the stroma (short arrow) while others nest in pools of mucin (long arrow), consistent with IDC with mucinous features. Pathologic examination of lymph node biopsy specimen (not shown) was positive for metastatic disease. (H-E stain; original magnification, ×4.)
1719761297617.png
 
Figure 9. DCIS in a 51-year-old man who presented with a palpable left breast mass. (A) Craniocaudal and MLO bilateral mammographic views show an irregular indistinct mass in the left breast at the 3-o’clock position, 1 cm from the nipple (arrows), corresponding to the patient’s palpable abnormality (marked by a BB skin marker), and no suspicious findings in the right breast. (B) US image shows a corresponding mixed cystic and solid irregular mass (arrowhead) with peripheral vascularity. (C) Photomicrograph of a specimen from mastectomy of the left breast shows an intraductal proliferation consisting of a monotonous population of atypical cells (arrows) in a cribriform pattern. The findings are consistent with DCIS, cribriform and micropapillary type, intermediate nuclear grade. (H-E stain; original magnification, ×4.
1719761433200.png
 
Figure 10. Encapsulated papillary carcinoma with foci of invasion and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the left breast first seen at CT (not shown)in a 68-year-old man. (A) Craniocaudal and MLO views of the left breast show a bilobed subareolar left breast mass (arrows) with partially indistinct margins and associated mild nipple retraction (arrowhead), which corresponds to the finding at CT (not shown). The BB marker on the mammogram indicates the nipple. (B) US image shows two adjacent corresponding complex cystic and solid masses (arrows), with subtle posterior acoustic enhancement. (C) Doppler US image of the larger mass shows minimal peripheral but no substantial internal vascularity (arrowhead). (D) Photomicrograph of a specimen from left mastectomy shows the encapsulated papillary carcinoma. The lesion has a well-defined capsule (black arrows) and demonstrates a papillary and micropapillary architecture (yellow arrows). Two separate foci of IDC, no special type, grade 2, and DCIS were also present (not shown). (H-E stain; original magnification, ×200.) (Photomicrograph courtesy of Olaronke Akintola-Ogunremi, MD.)
1719761520100.png
 
Figure 12. Melanoma metastasis to the breast in a 79-year-old man with a remote history of melanoma anda fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid mass in the left breast detected at a recent PET/CT examination (not shown). (A) Craniocaudal and MLO mammograms of the left breast show an oval indistinct mass in the posterior slightly upper inner left breast (arrows) that corresponds to the finding at PET/CT (not shown) and was found to be palpable at the time of this study; thus, a triangular-shaped skin marker was placed over the mass. (B) US image shows a corresponding oval circumscribed mildly heterogeneous hypoechoic mass (long arrow) with posterior acoustic enhancement (arrowhead) that abuts the pectoralis muscle (short arrow). (C) Photomicrograph of a left breast excisional biopsy specimen shows an atypical spindle cell proliferation with frequent large cells (long arrow) and mitoses (short arrow). (H-E stain; original magnification, ×10.) Ancillary studies (not shown) allowed confirmation of the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma.
1719761638047.png
 
Figure 13. Breast abscess in a 57-year-old male smoker with a palpable mass in the left breast for 1 month and a history of chronic left nipple retraction for 1 year. Pertinent medical history included psoriatic arthritis and immunosuppressive treatment. (A) Spot compression tangential view of the palpable left breast abnormality (marked by a BB skin marker) shows an irregular, indistinct, high-density mass in the subareolar breast (arrow), with associated nipple retraction (arrowhead). (B) US image shows an irregular complex cystic and solid mass (arrow), with some slightly in-distinct margins and posterior acoustic enhancement (b). The overlying nipple (arrowhead) can be seen and appears intact. (C) Doppler US image shows peripheral increased vascularity (arrow) but no internal vascularity. Core needle biopsy specimen (not shown) demonstrated a pleomorphic population of inflammatory cells (neutrophils, lymphocytes, and histocytes) infiltrating the breast parenchyma with necrosis, consistent with an abscess.
1719761808052.png
 
Figure 14. Hemangioma in a 61-year-old man with bilateral retroareolar breast pain.(A) Left MLO mammogram shows pseudogynecomastia. A microlobulated mass is seen in the upper left breast (arrow). (B) US image shows a corresponding superficial, parallel, microlobulated, hypoechoic mass (arrow) with minimal internal vascularity (not shown) and mild posterior acoustic enhancement (arrowhead). (C) Photomicrograph of a core needle biopsy specimen shows dilated vascular channels containing erythrocytes (arrow), consistent with a hemangioma. (H-E stain; original magnifi-cation,×4.)
1719761966371.png
 
Figure 15. Myofibroblastoma in two patients. (A, B) In a 71-year-old man with a palpable breast mass, MLO mammogram (A) shows a circumscribed, high-density, bilobed mass in the lower left breast (arrow in A), corresponding to the palpable lump (BB skin marker). US image (B) shows an oval, parallel, circumscribed, hypoechoic mass with internal vascularity (arrow in B). (C) In another male patient, photomicrograph of a core needle biopsy specimen shows bland spindle cell proliferation resembling a schwannoma. (H-E stain; original magnification, ×10.) S100 staining (not shown) was negative, but estrogen receptor and smooth muscle actin staining (not shown) were positive, supporting a diagnosis of myofibroblastoma.
1719762063758.png
 
Figure 16. Intraductal papilloma in two male patients. (A, B) Right MLO mammogram (A) in a 56-year-old man with new right nipple discharge and a palpable subareolar right breast mass shows gynecomastia and serpiginous tubular structures extending from the subareolar breast into the deeper breast tissue in the 6-o’clock region (arrows in A). The anterior part of this finding corresponds to the palpable area of concern (BB skin marker). US image (B) of this area shows corresponding ductal ectasia (arrows in B) and an intraductal mass (arrowhead in B). (C) Cropped right lateral mammogram (spot magnification view) in another male patient with subsequent biopsy-proven intraductal papilloma without atypia shows associated amorphous calcifications (arrow). (D) Photomicrograph of a surgical specimen from the patient shown in A and B shows arborizing fronds lined by epithelia land myoepithelial cells with central fibrovascular cores (arrow), consistent with a papilloma.(H-E stain; original magnification, ×4.)
1719762233034.png
 
Beyond Testosterone Book by Nelson Vergel
Figure 18. Parenchymal cyst in an 18-year-old man with a palpable subareolar breast mass. US image shows an oval, circumscribed, anechoic mass with an imperceptible wall (arrow), posterior acoustic enhancement (arrowhead), and no internal vascularity (not shown) in the subareolar left breast. There is no overlying tract noted through the skin. Aspiration was performed,yielding 4 mL of brownish fluid and complete resolution of the cyst. Cytologic results showed acute and chronic inflammation and macrophages, without evidence of malignancy. (Case courtesy of Hemali Desai, MD.)
1719762462186.png
 
Buy Lab Tests Online
Defy Medical TRT clinic

Sponsors

bodybuilder test discounted labs
cheap enclomiphene
TRT in UK Balance my hormones
Discounted Labs
Testosterone Doctor Near Me
Testosterone books nelson vergel
Register on ExcelMale.com
Trimix HCG Offer Excelmale
BUY HCG CIALIS

Online statistics

Members online
2
Guests online
7
Total visitors
9

Latest posts

Top