Penile Prothesis Considerations in the MSM Population

madman

Super Moderator


Watch starting at 31 minutes to watch Dallas (a gay porn star) who does an excellent testimonial.

Introductions and Program Overview​

  • Webinar Focus: Penile prosthesis considerations in the MSM (men who have sex with men) population—a rarely addressed topic in this format.
  • Moderators: Dr. Chris Nelson (psychiatry, Memorial Sloan Kettering, SMSNA treasurer) and Dr. Yaofei.
  • Speakers:
    • Dr. Justin Law (urologist, Kaiser Permanente, LGBTQ+ sexual health interest)
    • Dr. Jake Miller (urology resident, UC Irvine, research on ED and MSM)
    • Jim Walker/Dallas Teal (former broadcaster, gay adult film actor, penile implant recipient, patient advocate)
  • Program Structure:
    • Dr. Law: Erectile dysfunction (ED) considerations in MSM.
    • Dr. Miller: Penile prosthesis considerations in MSM.
    • Dr. Nelson & Jim Walker: Patient perspective discussion on prosthesis expectations and satisfaction.

Erectile Dysfunction in MSM: Epidemiology and Predictors (Dr. Law)​

  • Definition: MSM = men who have sex with men; only 44.5% identify as gay/homosexual.
  • Clinical Practice: Importance of asking about both sexual orientation and gender of sexual partners.
  • Prevalence:
    • 79% of MSM report at least one sexual dysfunction (ED, premature ejaculation, etc.).
    • 45% report ED specifically.
    • Homosexual men have 1.5x higher odds of reporting ED than heterosexual men.
  • Hypothesized Causes:
    • Psychological stress: social stigmatization, discrimination, internalized homonegativity, shame.
    • Relationship/partner stability issues, competition, insecurities.
  • Predictors of ED in MSM (Shinwan et al., 2012, n=2,700):
    • Older age, HIV positive status, lower urinary tract symptoms, prior ED medication use, lack of stable partner.
    • HIV-related ED: possibly due to androgen deficiency, immunosuppression, or antiretroviral therapy.
  • Assessment:
    • Sexual practices and preferences: sexual position (top/insertive, bottom/receptive, versatile) impacts management.
    • Erection importance varies by activity (penetration, self-image, masturbation, oral sex).
    • Erection as a sign of masculinity/arousal.
  • ED Treatment in MSM:
    • Similar to men who have sex with women, with key caveats.
    • Address psychogenic factors: psychological stress, relationship instability, self-esteem, body dysmorphia.
    • Referral to mental health providers may help.
    • Assess recreational drug use, especially chemsex/party and play (10.3% prevalence in MSM).
      • Caution: Intracavernosal injections in stimulant users due to priapism risk.
    • Penile prosthesis as an option for refractory ED (to be discussed further by Dr. Miller).

Penile Prosthesis in MSM: Satisfaction, Biomechanics, and Safety (Dr. Miller)​

  • Prevalence: High sexual dysfunction in MSM, but limited data on IPP (inflatable penile prosthesis) outcomes.
  • Medication Use:
    • 16–29% of gay/bisexual men use PDE5 inhibitors (Viagra, Cialis), but little data on progression to IPP.
  • UCI Multi-Center Study:
    • 49 MSM from 7 centers in 5 countries, all with AMS or Coloplast implants.
    • 21 primary implantations, no postoperative infections, 1 revision (non-infectious) at 15-month follow-up.
    • Median EDITS score: 93.2/100; Quality of Life: 72/80 (higher than historical averages).
  • Device Complications:
    • Dissatisfaction often linked to device malfunction.
    • Anal penetrative sex may expose prosthesis to higher forces due to sphincter/pelvic muscle tone.
  • Biomechanical Studies:
    • Ansari et al.: Device buckling at 980g axial force.
    • Henry et al.: Buckling at 1,500g (patient-inflated); no buckling when surgeon-inflated.
    • Cadaver/ex vivo: Buckling at up to 6,100g (cadaver), 5–8 newtons (ex vivo).
  • Anal vs. Vaginal Penetration Forces:
    • Vaginal: 500–1,500g (Karakin et al., 1980s).
    • Anal: UCI study—average 3,000g (range 2,600–4,200g), 2–6x higher than vaginal.
    • Anal penetration forces can exceed buckling thresholds, especially with suboptimal inflation.
  • Counseling Recommendations:
    • MSM (and any patient) engaging in anal penetration should be counseled on device risks.
    • Emphasize proper inflation technique; demonstrate and have patient practice in clinic.
    • More research needed on long-term outcomes and device durability in MSM.

Culturally Sensitive Sexual History Taking​

  • Sample Questions for MSM:
    • "Do you have sexual intercourse with male or female partners?"
    • If male: "What are your sexual preferences/positions (top, bottom, versatile)?"
    • "How important are erections for your sexual activity?"
  • For Men Who Have Sex with Women:
    • Ask about anal penetration and sexual practices; erection strength requirements may differ.
  • Intake Forms: Can help gather sensitive information non-verbally; patients can skip if uncomfortable.
  • Provider Approach: Comfort and openness are key; normalize discussions about sexual practices and relationship structures.

Surgeon Counseling for MSM Undergoing IPP​

  • Preoperative Counseling Should Address:
    • Higher forces during anal penetration may increase risk of device trauma/malfunction.
    • Advise patients to monitor for device issues and report changes.
    • Demonstrate and supervise device inflation to ensure proper technique.
    • Reinforce at first postoperative visit; ensure patient can fully inflate device.

Patient Perspective: Jim Walker/Dallas Teal​

  • Peer Resource: Acts as a peer resource for men with ED and penile implants; receives 30–60 weekly inquiries globally.
  • Barriers: Many men are reluctant to discuss ED or prosthesis with healthcare providers; peer support is often first contact.
  • Personal Journey:
    • ED began at age 28; HIV positive; tried oral meds, then daily tri-mix injections for adult film work.
    • Excessive injectable use led to penile damage (loss of sensitivity, curvature).
    • Underwent IPP after medical consultation; reports high satisfaction.
  • Device Use and Limitations:
    • Advises "respect your device"—avoid positions/devices (e.g., constriction rings) that stress the implant.
    • Avoids reverse cowboy/cowgirl and squatting-on-top positions due to buckling risk.
    • Has experienced buckling with partners inexperienced in receptive anal sex; recommends patience and alternatives.
    • Not concerned about future revisions; trusts device and provider.
  • Integration into Sexual Activity:
    • Prefers term "bionic" over "prosthetic" to reduce stigma.
    • Integrates inflation discreetly during foreplay; partners often unaware of implant.
    • Encourages confidence and openness; partner reactions are generally positive or curious.
  • Advice to Providers:
    • Understand and inquire about patients' sexual practices and relationship structures.
    • Avoid assumptions (e.g., asking gay men about wives).
    • Cultural competence is more important than provider's own orientation.
    • Outreach could include presence at LGBTQ+ events or online platforms for anonymous Q&A.

Relationship Structures and Sexual Practices in MSM​

  • Open Relationships/Non-Monogamy: Common in long-term MSM couples; frequency varies.
  • Sex Outside Relationship: Some couples engage regularly or occasionally; throuples and other arrangements exist.
  • Provider Role: Normalize and inquire about these practices without judgment.
  • Chemsex: Prevalent; can impact ED and treatment choices.

Community Engagement and Outreach​

  • Self-Treatment: Many MSM self-treat or seek advice from peers rather than providers.
  • Provider Outreach Suggestions:
    • Display inclusive symbols (e.g., rainbow flag) in clinics.
    • Register in LGBTQ+ friendly provider directories (e.g., GLMA).
    • Consider semi-anonymous online outreach or Q&A platforms.
    • Engage with community events or websites frequented by MSM.

Postoperative and Partner Satisfaction Data​

  • Survey Timing: Satisfaction surveys best administered at 3+ months post-IPP, after recovery.
  • Partner Satisfaction: No published data on partner satisfaction with IPP in MSM; only patient satisfaction and some data on ED in MSM.
  • Future Research: Partner satisfaction is an area for future research.

Postoperative Use and Recovery​

  • Standard Protocol: Device cycling starts at 2 weeks post-op; sexual activity (including anal penetration) permitted at 6 weeks.
  • Patient Guidance: Advise patients to start gently; most are cautious initially due to soreness.
  • Risks: Some patients may attempt use earlier, risking complications.

Barriers to Care and Recommendations​

  • Barriers: MSM may avoid seeking care due to stigma, lack of provider understanding, or fear of disclosure.
  • Provider Role: Foster inclusive, nonjudgmental environments and proactively address sexual health with all patients.
  • Peer Support: Visible community advocates (like Jim Walker) play a crucial role in education and destigmatization.

Screenshot (28360).png
 
Last edited by a moderator:

hCG Mixing Calculator

HCG Mixing Protocol Calculator

Online statistics

Members online
5
Guests online
1,097
Total visitors
1,102

Latest posts

Back
Top