ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Side Effect Management
What’s the general consensus on AI’s here?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DragonBits" data-source="post: 160980" data-attributes="member: 18023"><p>What about the large group of doctors, scientist and general population of men that say with a total T greater than 264 ng/dl you don't need TRT? I don't agree, and just ignore that group, it doesn't bother me in the least to not follow a group. I am just not much of a group follower.</p><p></p><p>What I am saying is, why would anyone follow what a group of men suggest when there isn't any clear science behind it?</p><p></p><p>It should be clear there is NO general consensus on the use of AI, which generally tells me that both sides on the issue have good reasons for their stance and there isn't any clear science that tells anyone that is a danger in either using or not using an AI. </p><p></p><p>Clear danger as in there is a clear danger in using opioids long term for pain management, there is a clear danger in smoking tobacco. But we all know people that have smoked tobacco their entire life with no problems. </p><p></p><p>What is clear, over using / dosing any potent medication has clear dangers. As far as I can tell, that is universally true.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DragonBits, post: 160980, member: 18023"] What about the large group of doctors, scientist and general population of men that say with a total T greater than 264 ng/dl you don't need TRT? I don't agree, and just ignore that group, it doesn't bother me in the least to not follow a group. I am just not much of a group follower. What I am saying is, why would anyone follow what a group of men suggest when there isn't any clear science behind it? It should be clear there is NO general consensus on the use of AI, which generally tells me that both sides on the issue have good reasons for their stance and there isn't any clear science that tells anyone that is a danger in either using or not using an AI. Clear danger as in there is a clear danger in using opioids long term for pain management, there is a clear danger in smoking tobacco. But we all know people that have smoked tobacco their entire life with no problems. What is clear, over using / dosing any potent medication has clear dangers. As far as I can tell, that is universally true. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Side Effect Management
What’s the general consensus on AI’s here?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top