ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Testostone levels declining with injections
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="madman" data-source="post: 197389" data-attributes="member: 13851"><p>Sure some may not do well on sub-q but it would be far from common and even then I would bet a majority of these same individuals are not following all the critical steps need to truly gauge the effectiveness of sub-q vs IM..... <u><strong>kept everything consistent such as protocol (dose T/injection frequency), same ester, waiting the full 4-6 weeks for levels to stabilize, testing at the true trough, using the same lab, same assay (most accurate) when comparing lab results for TT/FT</strong></u><strong>.</strong></p><p></p><p>Let alone I hope you understand hormones are in flux during the weeks leading up until blood levels have stabilized (4-6 weeks) and it is common to experience ups/downs during the transition as the body is trying to adjust.</p><p></p><p>Even then once blood levels have stabilized will take another 2-3 months for the body to adapt to those new levels and this is the critical time period when one should gauge how they truly feel overall regarding relief/improvement of low-t symptoms/overall well-being.</p><p></p><p>Otherwise one could not truly claim such (sub-q is inferior to IM)!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="madman, post: 197389, member: 13851"] Sure some may not do well on sub-q but it would be far from common and even then I would bet a majority of these same individuals are not following all the critical steps need to truly gauge the effectiveness of sub-q vs IM..... [U][B]kept everything consistent such as protocol (dose T/injection frequency), same ester, waiting the full 4-6 weeks for levels to stabilize, testing at the true trough, using the same lab, same assay (most accurate) when comparing lab results for TT/FT[/B][/U][B].[/B] Let alone I hope you understand hormones are in flux during the weeks leading up until blood levels have stabilized (4-6 weeks) and it is common to experience ups/downs during the transition as the body is trying to adjust. Even then once blood levels have stabilized will take another 2-3 months for the body to adapt to those new levels and this is the critical time period when one should gauge how they truly feel overall regarding relief/improvement of low-t symptoms/overall well-being. Otherwise one could not truly claim such (sub-q is inferior to IM)! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Testostone levels declining with injections
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top