ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Nandrolone Dosage - How much T?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="S1W" data-source="post: 171831" data-attributes="member: 16947"><p>I’m not as familiar with the science as some on this site, so forgive me if I don’t know the correct terms for what Im trying to describe.</p><p></p><p>Ive heard/read something along the lines of “nandrolone has a greater binding affinity...this in turn leaves more T unbound and results in higher FT...this can also cause higher E2 because now a lot more of that unbound T will convert to E2...”</p><p></p><p>So in light of that theory, I guess I’m curious why we so often hear that T:ND dose should be at least 1:1, with some even saying it should be at least 1.5:1. Because it almost seems like it should be the other way around, with T dose lower than ND...at least based on the theory above.</p><p></p><p>Could someone please educate me on this?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="S1W, post: 171831, member: 16947"] I’m not as familiar with the science as some on this site, so forgive me if I don’t know the correct terms for what Im trying to describe. Ive heard/read something along the lines of “nandrolone has a greater binding affinity...this in turn leaves more T unbound and results in higher FT...this can also cause higher E2 because now a lot more of that unbound T will convert to E2...” So in light of that theory, I guess I’m curious why we so often hear that T:ND dose should be at least 1:1, with some even saying it should be at least 1.5:1. Because it almost seems like it should be the other way around, with T dose lower than ND...at least based on the theory above. Could someone please educate me on this? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Nandrolone Dosage - How much T?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top