ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Workouts & Routines
Madman mTOR and AMPK
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="madman" data-source="post: 134461" data-attributes="member: 13851"><p>CONCLUSION This is the first report of the effects of incorporating either HIT or work-matched MICT into a concurrent training program on adaptations of maximal strength, CMJ performance, aerobic capacity, and body composition compared with performing RT alone.<strong> In summary, it was demonstrated that HIT and MICT similarly attenuated the RT-induced increase in maximal lower-, but not upper-body, strength, as well as increases in peak CMJ force and power.</strong> <strong>These observations suggest that<span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"> endurance training volume</span> may be a more critical mediator of interference to maximal strength gain <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">rather than training intensity</span>, at least in moderately-trained individuals</strong>. <strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Training induced increases in lower-body lean mass </span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">were attenuated for the </span><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">HIT+RT group relative to MICT+RT and RT</span><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">, although the magnitude of between-group differences in lean mass gain were small</span></strong><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">.</span> Total internal training load was higher for the HIT+RT group compared with the MICT+RT group, due primarily to a higher non-prescribed training load, which may have contributed to the attenuation of the lower-body lean mass gain for the HIT+RT group. <strong>Future work should further explore the <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">role of endurance training volume in the interference effect,</span> and whether low-volume HIT may confer benefits by minimizing interference when compared with higher volume HIT or MICT during periods of concurrent training.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="madman, post: 134461, member: 13851"] CONCLUSION This is the first report of the effects of incorporating either HIT or work-matched MICT into a concurrent training program on adaptations of maximal strength, CMJ performance, aerobic capacity, and body composition compared with performing RT alone.[B] In summary, it was demonstrated that HIT and MICT similarly attenuated the RT-induced increase in maximal lower-, but not upper-body, strength, as well as increases in peak CMJ force and power.[/B] [B]These observations suggest that[COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)] endurance training volume[/COLOR] may be a more critical mediator of interference to maximal strength gain [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]rather than training intensity[/COLOR], at least in moderately-trained individuals[/B]. [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Training induced increases in lower-body lean mass [/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]were attenuated for the [/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]HIT+RT group relative to MICT+RT and RT[/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)], although the magnitude of between-group differences in lean mass gain were small[/COLOR][/B][COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)].[/COLOR] Total internal training load was higher for the HIT+RT group compared with the MICT+RT group, due primarily to a higher non-prescribed training load, which may have contributed to the attenuation of the lower-body lean mass gain for the HIT+RT group. [B]Future work should further explore the [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]role of endurance training volume in the interference effect,[/COLOR] and whether low-volume HIT may confer benefits by minimizing interference when compared with higher volume HIT or MICT during periods of concurrent training.[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Workouts & Routines
Madman mTOR and AMPK
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top