ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
First post. Can’t get E2 under control, starting to worry
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobRoy" data-source="post: 276891" data-attributes="member: 42893"><p>Rob Roy doesn't run away from anything. Everyone of my points or videos is based purely on the medical literature. I can provide you with dozens of studies that show you that raising testosterone levels to the mid physiologic range doesn't work. If I have to tell you what studies they are, then that means you know nothing about testosterone. That's the point you want me to teach you what it's taken me over 20 years to learn. The T trials is one of those along with the traverse trial that just came out. And I can provide you with many other studies that show your testosterone didn't work. In every single one of those studies, they only raiseAnd I can provide you with many other studies that show your testosterone didn't work. In every single one of those studies, they only raised testosterone levels a little bit. Problem with men like you and even tear load is that I can tell you what the medical literature says, but I can't help you understand it and I can't help you lose your confirmational, bias and belief, perseverance. There are plenty of positions that understand that testosterone should be treated like insulin or other drugs, and titrated to affect and not specifically aim for a mid physiologic number. Take a look at Rebecca Glaser and women and learn a little bit. You gotta think outside the box and you have to look at what we see from a clinical standpoint, utilizing testosterone for decades. We also have to look at the studies where they didn't give a lot of testosterone, and what did or didn't happen. You can see urologist around the country, giving lectures on how bad testosterone is and how it shouldn't be prescribed because it doesn't work. And those lectures every single study they put up to support their view is a study where they gave a little bit of testosterone, and it didn't work. Tear load had no idea what he didn't know. I repeatedly asked him to provide a medical study or Tere load had no idea what he didn't know. I repeatedly asked him to provide a RCT where testosterone caused harm. He could never do it. He was stuck in in vitro studies and not in vivo studies. Look, I could care less how little testosterone you use or anyone else. The problem is the bad advice you give.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobRoy, post: 276891, member: 42893"] Rob Roy doesn't run away from anything. Everyone of my points or videos is based purely on the medical literature. I can provide you with dozens of studies that show you that raising testosterone levels to the mid physiologic range doesn't work. If I have to tell you what studies they are, then that means you know nothing about testosterone. That's the point you want me to teach you what it's taken me over 20 years to learn. The T trials is one of those along with the traverse trial that just came out. And I can provide you with many other studies that show your testosterone didn't work. In every single one of those studies, they only raiseAnd I can provide you with many other studies that show your testosterone didn't work. In every single one of those studies, they only raised testosterone levels a little bit. Problem with men like you and even tear load is that I can tell you what the medical literature says, but I can't help you understand it and I can't help you lose your confirmational, bias and belief, perseverance. There are plenty of positions that understand that testosterone should be treated like insulin or other drugs, and titrated to affect and not specifically aim for a mid physiologic number. Take a look at Rebecca Glaser and women and learn a little bit. You gotta think outside the box and you have to look at what we see from a clinical standpoint, utilizing testosterone for decades. We also have to look at the studies where they didn't give a lot of testosterone, and what did or didn't happen. You can see urologist around the country, giving lectures on how bad testosterone is and how it shouldn't be prescribed because it doesn't work. And those lectures every single study they put up to support their view is a study where they gave a little bit of testosterone, and it didn't work. Tear load had no idea what he didn't know. I repeatedly asked him to provide a medical study or Tere load had no idea what he didn't know. I repeatedly asked him to provide a RCT where testosterone caused harm. He could never do it. He was stuck in in vitro studies and not in vivo studies. Look, I could care less how little testosterone you use or anyone else. The problem is the bad advice you give. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
First post. Can’t get E2 under control, starting to worry
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top