ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Nutrition and Supplements
Effects of fish protein hydrolysate ingestion on endothelial function compared to whey protein hydrolysate in humans
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="madman" data-source="post: 153093" data-attributes="member: 13851"><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">ABSTRACT</span></strong></p><p><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)"><strong>Fish protein-derived bioactive peptides may improve endothelial dysfunction through an antihypertensive and antioxidant effect.</strong></span> However, few studies have evaluated the bioactive peptides effect on vascular function. <strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">Therefore, this study investigates the effect of a single dose of </span><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)">fish protein hydrolysate (FPH) </span><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">or whey protein hydrolysates (WPH) on endothelium-dependent dilation in nine healthy adults. </span><span style="color: rgb(26, 188, 156)">The subjects ingested a single dose (20 g) of FPH, WHP or placebo (PLA).</span></strong> The endothelium-dependent dilation was evaluated by flow-mediated dilatation before and at 30, 60 and 120 min after supplementation. Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of the FPH and WPH supplements was evaluated by using the Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity assay. <span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong>There was a significant increase of endothelium-dependent dilation at 30 min after WPH</strong></span><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)"> <strong>but not after FPH as compared to PLA.</strong></span> <span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)"><strong>There was a significant great TAC in FPH than WPH supplement.</strong></span><strong><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)"> A single dose of FPH was not able to improve endothelium-dependent dilation</span><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"> compared to WPH. </span></strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Conclusion </strong></p><p><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)"><strong>This study demonstrated that a single oral dose (20 g) of FPH did not improve endothelium-dependent dilation in healthy young subjects as compared to WPH. </strong></span><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)"><strong>Future studies could evaluate the effect of FPH ingestion on vascular function of the others populations, such as in cardiovascular risk factors and elderly subjects, which commonly present oxidative stress. </strong></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="madman, post: 153093, member: 13851"] [B][COLOR=rgb(0, 0, 0)]ABSTRACT[/COLOR][/B] [COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)][B]Fish protein-derived bioactive peptides may improve endothelial dysfunction through an antihypertensive and antioxidant effect.[/B][/COLOR] However, few studies have evaluated the bioactive peptides effect on vascular function. [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Therefore, this study investigates the effect of a single dose of [/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)]fish protein hydrolysate (FPH) [/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]or whey protein hydrolysates (WPH) on endothelium-dependent dilation in nine healthy adults. [/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(26, 188, 156)]The subjects ingested a single dose (20 g) of FPH, WHP or placebo (PLA).[/COLOR][/B] The endothelium-dependent dilation was evaluated by flow-mediated dilatation before and at 30, 60 and 120 min after supplementation. Total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of the FPH and WPH supplements was evaluated by using the Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity assay. [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B]There was a significant increase of endothelium-dependent dilation at 30 min after WPH[/B][/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)] [B]but not after FPH as compared to PLA.[/B][/COLOR][B] [/B][COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)][B]There was a significant great TAC in FPH than WPH supplement.[/B][/COLOR][B][COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)] A single dose of FPH was not able to improve endothelium-dependent dilation[/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)] compared to WPH. [/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)][/COLOR][/B] [B]Conclusion [/B] [COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)][B]This study demonstrated that a single oral dose (20 g) of FPH did not improve endothelium-dependent dilation in healthy young subjects as compared to WPH. [/B][/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)][B]Future studies could evaluate the effect of FPH ingestion on vascular function of the others populations, such as in cardiovascular risk factors and elderly subjects, which commonly present oxidative stress. [/B][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
General Health & Fitness
Nutrition and Supplements
Effects of fish protein hydrolysate ingestion on endothelial function compared to whey protein hydrolysate in humans
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top