Frequently on the forum we see a lot of discussions about the possible benefits of different injection schedules. For example, some guys claim to be able to lower E2 and HCT on more frequent injection protocols. Other guys state that overall lower dosage, regardless of protocol, makes them feel better, etc.
I'd like to discuss the trade offs switching between different protocols, aside from the obvious ones like having to inject more/less frequently, etc. Basically, there is often a focus on negative side effects that we want to address when switching from one protocol to another - are there positives that we may be leaving behind too? One example in particular that I'm curious about:
For guys that have TT/FT trough levels in the upper normal ranges, depending on protocol and SHBG, there is a decent chance that peak levels are high out of range for part of the week. Suppose these guys were to switch to a more frequent protocol that smooths out the peaks and valleys. With the new protocol, the guy now has peak and trough levels that are both in the upper range of normal, never going above, and say E2 goes down a bit.
Would a guy in this scenario experience reduced muscle building capacity compared to when peaks were high out of range and E2 was higher, or would muscle building capacity be better with lower TT/FT levels yet also lower E2? Or would it make no difference at all?
Anyone have experience with this, or other things that you found didn't work as well for you on a particular protocol even if you achieved your goal of addressing whatever side effect you wanted to address?
I'd like to discuss the trade offs switching between different protocols, aside from the obvious ones like having to inject more/less frequently, etc. Basically, there is often a focus on negative side effects that we want to address when switching from one protocol to another - are there positives that we may be leaving behind too? One example in particular that I'm curious about:
For guys that have TT/FT trough levels in the upper normal ranges, depending on protocol and SHBG, there is a decent chance that peak levels are high out of range for part of the week. Suppose these guys were to switch to a more frequent protocol that smooths out the peaks and valleys. With the new protocol, the guy now has peak and trough levels that are both in the upper range of normal, never going above, and say E2 goes down a bit.
Would a guy in this scenario experience reduced muscle building capacity compared to when peaks were high out of range and E2 was higher, or would muscle building capacity be better with lower TT/FT levels yet also lower E2? Or would it make no difference at all?
Anyone have experience with this, or other things that you found didn't work as well for you on a particular protocol even if you achieved your goal of addressing whatever side effect you wanted to address?