ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Big Drop in T going from IM to Sub-Q. Why?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HealthMan" data-source="post: 146100" data-attributes="member: 13512"><p>I already made my case on that other thread in why this study is flawed in my opinion (just because it was submitted to the FDA doesn’t make it bullet proof. Yes it shows that both methods produce equivalent results on average. But on average doesn’t give a great picture for single individuals). Just as an example big pharma producers of depot testosterone suggest once every 2 weeks injection based on their great clinical studies. I dont think anyone here including yourself agrees with that. All this study shows is that for a limited number of individuals using different dosages of testosterone and assuming linearity... on average IM vs Subq are equivalent. But again it is not worth it dissecting things because you will disagree anyways. A study with a greater sample, using same dosage and injection frequency and comparing testosterone levels for each individual separately would be a great one. Then you could isolate other variables like SHBG for instance and get a much more meaningful results.</p><p>Also my conclusion is based on a sample much greater than the aforementioned study.</p><p>If you don’t remember what you said and is now trying to change what you wrote thats fine. Like I said lets agree to disagree. People are entitled to have different opinions. I respect yours and you should do the same. Case closed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HealthMan, post: 146100, member: 13512"] I already made my case on that other thread in why this study is flawed in my opinion (just because it was submitted to the FDA doesn’t make it bullet proof. Yes it shows that both methods produce equivalent results on average. But on average doesn’t give a great picture for single individuals). Just as an example big pharma producers of depot testosterone suggest once every 2 weeks injection based on their great clinical studies. I dont think anyone here including yourself agrees with that. All this study shows is that for a limited number of individuals using different dosages of testosterone and assuming linearity... on average IM vs Subq are equivalent. But again it is not worth it dissecting things because you will disagree anyways. A study with a greater sample, using same dosage and injection frequency and comparing testosterone levels for each individual separately would be a great one. Then you could isolate other variables like SHBG for instance and get a much more meaningful results. Also my conclusion is based on a sample much greater than the aforementioned study. If you don’t remember what you said and is now trying to change what you wrote thats fine. Like I said lets agree to disagree. People are entitled to have different opinions. I respect yours and you should do the same. Case closed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Big Drop in T going from IM to Sub-Q. Why?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top