According to a legal dictionary maintained by the Legal Information Institute at Cornell University, judges and juries must answer six questions to find for a plaintiff who brings a fraudulent misrepresentation case:
- Did the defendant make a representation?
- Was the representation false?
- Did the defendant know that the representation was false at the time, or did the defendant make the statement recklessly without knowing whether it was true?
- Was the fraudulent misrepresentation made with the intention of having the plaintiff rely on it?
- Did the plaintiff did rely on the fraudulent misrepresentation?
- Did the plaintiff suffer harm as a result of the fraudulent misrepresentation?
- The $150 million punitive damage award in Mitchell v. AbbVie Inc. will almost definitely be overturned when the company appeals it because the trial jury answered only a few of these questions affirmatively. However, AndroGel lawsuits brought by plaintiffs who used the product to treat Low-T could succeed. Pharmaceutical companies must be held accountable for ignoring or covering up their drug's risks and for overselling products' benefits.