ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Expert Interviews
Questions for Specific Doctors & Experts
“Sweet spot E2” vs test levels
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tmaxey1" data-source="post: 140529" data-attributes="member: 38311"><p>This brings up the question of what point are test levels harmful vs beneficial. If someone has a level of 2500 but all labs show to be healthy and in a good range then what long term harm is being done? </p><p>Higher testosterone equals less body fat and less body fat equals less long term diseases. But how high can one hypothetically go and not have other levels increase? Does red blood cell count increase at 2500 levels ect? </p><p></p><p>Are there any humans that actually have natural T levels over 2000? Even if there isn’t does that mean it isn’t better to have it? Should we just accept normalcy as optimums. </p><p></p><p>This is an interesting subject for sure. </p><p></p><p>If symptoms are cured, patient is feeling great, and labs show no concerns then what’s the problem? On the surface this sounds like quality of life.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tmaxey1, post: 140529, member: 38311"] This brings up the question of what point are test levels harmful vs beneficial. If someone has a level of 2500 but all labs show to be healthy and in a good range then what long term harm is being done? Higher testosterone equals less body fat and less body fat equals less long term diseases. But how high can one hypothetically go and not have other levels increase? Does red blood cell count increase at 2500 levels ect? Are there any humans that actually have natural T levels over 2000? Even if there isn’t does that mean it isn’t better to have it? Should we just accept normalcy as optimums. This is an interesting subject for sure. If symptoms are cured, patient is feeling great, and labs show no concerns then what’s the problem? On the surface this sounds like quality of life. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Expert Interviews
Questions for Specific Doctors & Experts
“Sweet spot E2” vs test levels
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top