Reply to thread

Yes, decreasing a persons weight to get them closer to a healthy weight for their frame will always result in their health improving, but that doesn’t mean losing weight is magnitudes more important than what the person is actually eating. It’s not as black or white as that. They’re both very important, when it comes to optimal health.


And there’s many flawed studies out there showing that red meat increases cardiovascular disease/ rates of cancer.  It’s just not the case when u look at people that are actually doing full carnivore. Plus, the first article u posted talks about people that ate both red meat and processed meats at the same time. Those things are not the same. Processed meats will increase ur risk of cardiovascular disease/ cancer, unprocessed red meat will not. If u follow anybody that does full carnivore, and tracks their health very well, u’ll see that 100% of the time their health gets to a place where their cardiovascular risk becomes about as low as it can possibly get. Zero calcium in their arteries, hdl high, ldl moderate to high, triglycerides extremely low, inflammation extremely low, fasting insulin levels extremely low, HbA1c low. Literally exactly what u want to see if optimal health/ low cardiovascular risk/ low cancer risk are ur goals. Studies are hit and miss with things. A high majority of the time all studies have flaws in them, and then a high number of studies are also corrupt and involve conflicts of interest. So studies do have their place, but what u want to look at more is anecdotal experiences, and what people are actually experiencing in the real world. At the end of the day, that’s obv what’s more important


Back
Top