ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Who's currently on T propionate?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DS3" data-source="post: 167546" data-attributes="member: 18514"><p>"As you might imagine, proving these ideas to your satisfaction is not a high priority. Maybe if you were one of the reviewers for a journal submission of mine. In any case, the ideas are largely derivative and deductive in nature."</p><p></p><p>In other words, this says, "I've taken studies conducted on theoretical mathematical components and my own understanding of pharmacokinetics and extrapolated that information to make bold statements that are not actually validated in current literature." So basically you speak over people's heads and have lofty hypotheses that you've deduced from research on theoretical computations, but we should believe you because, well, you seem to understand pharmacokinetics at a higher level, so even if what you are saying at this point still pseudoscience, we should just accept your hypotheses as fact because, well, you sound smart, so it must be true. Right?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DS3, post: 167546, member: 18514"] "As you might imagine, proving these ideas to your satisfaction is not a high priority. Maybe if you were one of the reviewers for a journal submission of mine. In any case, the ideas are largely derivative and deductive in nature." In other words, this says, "I've taken studies conducted on theoretical mathematical components and my own understanding of pharmacokinetics and extrapolated that information to make bold statements that are not actually validated in current literature." So basically you speak over people's heads and have lofty hypotheses that you've deduced from research on theoretical computations, but we should believe you because, well, you seem to understand pharmacokinetics at a higher level, so even if what you are saying at this point still pseudoscience, we should just accept your hypotheses as fact because, well, you sound smart, so it must be true. Right? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Who's currently on T propionate?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top