ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
When Testosterone Is Not Enough
"Urinary-derived hCG preparations are highly carcinogenic"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tareload" data-source="post: 244600"><p>Previous comments I made on this (my oncology buddy shot me right down, see above):</p><p></p><div style="text-align: justify; max-width: %s">Additional reading and review I've done indicates the prion issue is more theoretical than the fact that urinary-derived hCG has a whole host of growth factors/cytokines the concentrations of which are highly variable and depend on manufacturer and batch. I've attached a few pertinent publications for your review if interested (perhaps you have already read them). Interesting that urinary-derived hCG now being trial for immunosuppression with various ailments (see second attachment). This researcher has spent a bit of effort summarizing his findings: xttp://hcglab.com/hcg-the-root-of-human-evolution/using-hcg-as-a-dietary-aid-or-as-a-anabolic-steroid-promoter/ He's recently written a book on it: <a href="https://www.elsevier.com/books/human-chorionic-gonadotropin-hcg/cole/978-0-12-800749-5" target="_blank">Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) - 2nd Edition</a></div> <div style="text-align: justify; max-width: %s"></div> <div style="text-align: justify; max-width: %s">My reading of relevant literature is there is a lot of correlation/causation in the literature wrt to hyperglycosylated hCG and beta-core fragment and its effects on the body. Clearly, there is a lot of other growth factors/cytokines in the u-hCG but I don't see the FDA getting too worried about it after being on the market for 50 years?? Maybe they should. Checking the FDA orange book I see u-hCG was last approved in 1982. A lot has been learned since then regarding various forms and degradation products of hCG. I realize risk vs reward for any medication.</div> <div style="text-align: justify; max-width: %s"></div> <div style="text-align: justify; max-width: %s"></div> <div style="text-align: justify; max-width: %s">From Yarram 2004:</div> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><div style="text-align: justify; max-width: %s"></div> <div style="text-align: justify; max-width: %s"></div> <div style="text-align: justify; max-width: %s"></div> <div style="text-align: justify; max-width: %s">From link I attached above:</div> <div style="text-align: justify; max-width: %s"></div> </p><div style="text-align: justify; max-width: %s">Based on this, you are in catch 22 whether you use rhCG or uhCG.</div> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Note you will see the website linked above is now long done.</p><p></p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15237021/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26389834/[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tareload, post: 244600"] Previous comments I made on this (my oncology buddy shot me right down, see above): [JUSTIFY]Additional reading and review I've done indicates the prion issue is more theoretical than the fact that urinary-derived hCG has a whole host of growth factors/cytokines the concentrations of which are highly variable and depend on manufacturer and batch. I've attached a few pertinent publications for your review if interested (perhaps you have already read them). Interesting that urinary-derived hCG now being trial for immunosuppression with various ailments (see second attachment). This researcher has spent a bit of effort summarizing his findings: xttp://hcglab.com/hcg-the-root-of-human-evolution/using-hcg-as-a-dietary-aid-or-as-a-anabolic-steroid-promoter/ He's recently written a book on it: [URL='https://www.elsevier.com/books/human-chorionic-gonadotropin-hcg/cole/978-0-12-800749-5']Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) - 2nd Edition[/URL] My reading of relevant literature is there is a lot of correlation/causation in the literature wrt to hyperglycosylated hCG and beta-core fragment and its effects on the body. Clearly, there is a lot of other growth factors/cytokines in the u-hCG but I don't see the FDA getting too worried about it after being on the market for 50 years?? Maybe they should. Checking the FDA orange book I see u-hCG was last approved in 1982. A lot has been learned since then regarding various forms and degradation products of hCG. I realize risk vs reward for any medication. From Yarram 2004:[/JUSTIFY] [JUSTIFY] From link I attached above: [/JUSTIFY] [JUSTIFY]Based on this, you are in catch 22 whether you use rhCG or uhCG.[/JUSTIFY] Note you will see the website linked above is now long done. [URL unfurl="true"]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15237021/[/URL] [URL unfurl="true"]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26389834/[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
When Testosterone Is Not Enough
"Urinary-derived hCG preparations are highly carcinogenic"
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top