ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
TRT to Supraphysiological Levels for Body Building
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tareload" data-source="post: 228429"><p>Hey, thanks for the link. I do remember seeing this but would love to have a gander at the distribution of TT in the study (especially the "high" arm which is labeled as >742 ng/dl). I wonder how many of those 140 were treated with mean TT level above range say 1000-1200 ng/dl. I am betting $1 not many. No ethical cardiologist would operate outside reasonable standard of care.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/S0735-1097%2816%2932098-8[/URL]</p><p></p><p><img src="https://www.jacc.org/cms/asset/1d94b9b4-2f36-48c5-ab65-23d128d8a888/fx1.jpg" class="bbImage" alt="" data-url="https://www.jacc.org/cms/asset/1d94b9b4-2f36-48c5-ab65-23d128d8a888/fx1.jpg" style="" /></p><p></p><p>If anyone has a link to the raw data or companion publication please share. To me a big difference between what is labeled "high" here and a typical TOT protocol of 1200-1500 ng/dl TT trough (fT many times between 30-50 ng/dl).</p><p></p><p>The science seems pretty understandable in my mind. Too little or too much T is bad. What is too much T at the individual level (dose response) over time? How bad do you want to know? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tareload, post: 228429"] Hey, thanks for the link. I do remember seeing this but would love to have a gander at the distribution of TT in the study (especially the "high" arm which is labeled as >742 ng/dl). I wonder how many of those 140 were treated with mean TT level above range say 1000-1200 ng/dl. I am betting $1 not many. No ethical cardiologist would operate outside reasonable standard of care. [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/S0735-1097%2816%2932098-8[/URL] [IMG]https://www.jacc.org/cms/asset/1d94b9b4-2f36-48c5-ab65-23d128d8a888/fx1.jpg[/IMG] If anyone has a link to the raw data or companion publication please share. To me a big difference between what is labeled "high" here and a typical TOT protocol of 1200-1500 ng/dl TT trough (fT many times between 30-50 ng/dl). The science seems pretty understandable in my mind. Too little or too much T is bad. What is too much T at the individual level (dose response) over time? How bad do you want to know? :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
TRT to Supraphysiological Levels for Body Building
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top