ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
TRT and LGD? Is it a bad idea?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AndyP" data-source="post: 140156" data-attributes="member: 37902"><p>Christer, you need to scratch further beneath the surface. There is plenty of evidence to suggest that at suggested BB dosages certain SARMs are not as benign as they are touted. The effect on lipids and SHBG is reported if you dig down a level or two. For the most part no one notices as it’s unusual to have anyone actually have bloodwork using SARMs . Mine were sourced from a highly respected vendor and were not pro-hormones based on previous experience. </p><p>To be fair I’m not anti SARMs, they do work and quite often work well. My issue is that they are not a benign wonder drug with no side effects and I want people to open their eyes to this. They seem to be popular with those trying to avoid pinning and to stay (just about) on the right side of the law. For this they probably are an option. However, for those of us already pinning we would probably by better served by running an injectable cycle. For one thing it’s cheaper. For another there is a massive available history of what to expect and how to deal with it (relatively) safely.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AndyP, post: 140156, member: 37902"] Christer, you need to scratch further beneath the surface. There is plenty of evidence to suggest that at suggested BB dosages certain SARMs are not as benign as they are touted. The effect on lipids and SHBG is reported if you dig down a level or two. For the most part no one notices as it’s unusual to have anyone actually have bloodwork using SARMs . Mine were sourced from a highly respected vendor and were not pro-hormones based on previous experience. To be fair I’m not anti SARMs, they do work and quite often work well. My issue is that they are not a benign wonder drug with no side effects and I want people to open their eyes to this. They seem to be popular with those trying to avoid pinning and to stay (just about) on the right side of the law. For this they probably are an option. However, for those of us already pinning we would probably by better served by running an injectable cycle. For one thing it’s cheaper. For another there is a massive available history of what to expect and how to deal with it (relatively) safely. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
TRT and LGD? Is it a bad idea?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top