ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
TRT and LGD? Is it a bad idea?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AndyP" data-source="post: 138723" data-attributes="member: 37902"><p>Voices, understand and agree but the bulk of the information about SARMs around the web leads people to believe they are fairly benign. Dosing information seems to push quite high as the ‘recommended’ norm. Unfortunately a lot of the forums that push these hard have a vested interest (sponsors or sales) and downplay the risks. The information on the problems is out there but it is hard to drill down to. It was only after I saw my SHBG reduced to 6, LDL up 70 points, HDL down 10 and blood pressure sitting at hypertensive that I googled ‘SHBG and LGD’ and saw the pubmed report that highlighted this.</p><p>I did start slow and work up, for someone my size and strength 10ml of LGD should have been about right according to net wisdom. I will read more and be more careful in future.</p><p>I think the other attraction of SARMs for a lot of people is their (dubious) leagal status and lack of pinning required. I really think for those already on trt a full on injectable cycle is far safer in the overall scheme of things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AndyP, post: 138723, member: 37902"] Voices, understand and agree but the bulk of the information about SARMs around the web leads people to believe they are fairly benign. Dosing information seems to push quite high as the ‘recommended’ norm. Unfortunately a lot of the forums that push these hard have a vested interest (sponsors or sales) and downplay the risks. The information on the problems is out there but it is hard to drill down to. It was only after I saw my SHBG reduced to 6, LDL up 70 points, HDL down 10 and blood pressure sitting at hypertensive that I googled ‘SHBG and LGD’ and saw the pubmed report that highlighted this. I did start slow and work up, for someone my size and strength 10ml of LGD should have been about right according to net wisdom. I will read more and be more careful in future. I think the other attraction of SARMs for a lot of people is their (dubious) leagal status and lack of pinning required. I really think for those already on trt a full on injectable cycle is far safer in the overall scheme of things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
TRT and LGD? Is it a bad idea?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top