ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Excel Male Lounge Forums
The Hang Out - Where Everything Goes!
Toxic Femininity and Red Pill Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DixieWrecked" data-source="post: 222790" data-attributes="member: 38965"><p>The other day I was talking with two co-workers. One male and one female. The male had just become a father and we were talking about how attached the newborn is to her mother and how he feels he is currently playing a background support role at the moment. The conversation morphed into how a mother and father have different parental roles as evidenced by the newborns attachment to her mother/food source at her very young age. The conversation could have gotten very scientific, diving into neurochemistry and family dynamics, the human maturation process. BUT before that could happen we were called sexist by the female for stating that mothers and fathers are different while equally important. And she was very serious. She stated a woman can fill both roles of mother and father. I stated that there is data that suggests that offspring success rate is higher when both parents are present. Of course there are outliers but the data is there, men are important in child development. Later on we we discussed how strange it is that we could be called sexist, which is a substantial accusation, for such an established and well meaning perspective. But, ya know....feminism. </p><p></p><p>So bixt I suspect your intuition is correct. People walking on eggshells even when a completely sane perspective is offered.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DixieWrecked, post: 222790, member: 38965"] The other day I was talking with two co-workers. One male and one female. The male had just become a father and we were talking about how attached the newborn is to her mother and how he feels he is currently playing a background support role at the moment. The conversation morphed into how a mother and father have different parental roles as evidenced by the newborns attachment to her mother/food source at her very young age. The conversation could have gotten very scientific, diving into neurochemistry and family dynamics, the human maturation process. BUT before that could happen we were called sexist by the female for stating that mothers and fathers are different while equally important. And she was very serious. She stated a woman can fill both roles of mother and father. I stated that there is data that suggests that offspring success rate is higher when both parents are present. Of course there are outliers but the data is there, men are important in child development. Later on we we discussed how strange it is that we could be called sexist, which is a substantial accusation, for such an established and well meaning perspective. But, ya know....feminism. So bixt I suspect your intuition is correct. People walking on eggshells even when a completely sane perspective is offered. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Excel Male Lounge Forums
The Hang Out - Where Everything Goes!
Toxic Femininity and Red Pill Discussion
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top