ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Thoughts on E2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gman86" data-source="post: 127704" data-attributes="member: 15043"><p>So I just had an interesting thought about E2 levels in men. So the gold standard in regards to where we want our hormones, is to get them to the levels that they were when we were in our prime, correct? So probably around 18-22, I would assume for most men, hormone wise at least. Take total and free testosterone, for example. Ideally, most men seem to do well when their total and free T level is that of the average 18-22 year old healthy male. Obviously free T is more important. Also, the top end of the free T range is probably based off of males in society today, so it's probably a little low. So I would imagine that striving to have free T levels 30% higher than the top end of the current ranges should be just fine as well.</p><p></p><p>Anyways, so if this is the current thoughts on where we should be trying to get our T levels, why is E2 any different. Obviously, the most important thing is symptom relief, not where our levels our so much on T or E2, but for argument's sake, let's just focus on the numbers. Are we complicating things too much when it comes to E2? I'm not sure, hence why I'm starting this thread. But it makes a lot of sense to me to treat E2 the same way we would treat testosterone. Just focus on bringing guy's levels to around where the average 18-22 year old male's E2 would be. What do you guy's all think about this?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gman86, post: 127704, member: 15043"] So I just had an interesting thought about E2 levels in men. So the gold standard in regards to where we want our hormones, is to get them to the levels that they were when we were in our prime, correct? So probably around 18-22, I would assume for most men, hormone wise at least. Take total and free testosterone, for example. Ideally, most men seem to do well when their total and free T level is that of the average 18-22 year old healthy male. Obviously free T is more important. Also, the top end of the free T range is probably based off of males in society today, so it's probably a little low. So I would imagine that striving to have free T levels 30% higher than the top end of the current ranges should be just fine as well. Anyways, so if this is the current thoughts on where we should be trying to get our T levels, why is E2 any different. Obviously, the most important thing is symptom relief, not where our levels our so much on T or E2, but for argument's sake, let's just focus on the numbers. Are we complicating things too much when it comes to E2? I'm not sure, hence why I'm starting this thread. But it makes a lot of sense to me to treat E2 the same way we would treat testosterone. Just focus on bringing guy's levels to around where the average 18-22 year old male's E2 would be. What do you guy's all think about this? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Thoughts on E2
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top