ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
This YouTube Video Shows How a Doctor Can Mess You Up
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Re-Ride" data-source="post: 36847" data-attributes="member: 8395"><p>Yes and no. The big lie: "catastrophic coverage" workers paid for that was never delivered. Buy a policy at age 21. Pay 25 yrs of premiums then develop a costly condition. At that point the carrier should never have been allowed to dump policy holders on the ta payers yet that's exactly what they got away with. On top of that they've fought for years against the right of workers t buy Medicare. Had Medicare collected those premiums all those decades the funding for the catastrophic care would be in place. </p><p></p><p>Less people get quality care: No. Medicare has an incredibly good record of delivering excellent health care with very low overhead. No part of Medicare premiums are used for yachts, lobbying, kickbacks, fancy hotels, investor dividends or billion dollar CEO perks. Virtually all medicare premiums are paid out for actual care and at negotiated rates. </p><p></p><p>Two tiered care: As it stands now we are heading for a two tiered system where quality care is reserved for the uber wealthy. </p><p></p><p>The U.S. has a shamefully low health care ranking when compared to the rest of the industrialized world as measured by both vitality and survival. Efficiency levels are woefully inadequate. Consider endocrine care alone. Virtually no one here feels they are getting anywhere near the care they ought to.and we or our insurance is paying through the teeth for the horrendous care we do get. </p><p></p><p>We don't need "death panels" or "socialized medicine" to fix the problem. Medicare is neither of those things. We need to ask ourselves why universal access to Medicare was "taken off the table" on day one of the health insurance reform hearings. Eliminating graft is part of the solution and empowering patients another.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Re-Ride, post: 36847, member: 8395"] Yes and no. The big lie: "catastrophic coverage" workers paid for that was never delivered. Buy a policy at age 21. Pay 25 yrs of premiums then develop a costly condition. At that point the carrier should never have been allowed to dump policy holders on the ta payers yet that's exactly what they got away with. On top of that they've fought for years against the right of workers t buy Medicare. Had Medicare collected those premiums all those decades the funding for the catastrophic care would be in place. Less people get quality care: No. Medicare has an incredibly good record of delivering excellent health care with very low overhead. No part of Medicare premiums are used for yachts, lobbying, kickbacks, fancy hotels, investor dividends or billion dollar CEO perks. Virtually all medicare premiums are paid out for actual care and at negotiated rates. Two tiered care: As it stands now we are heading for a two tiered system where quality care is reserved for the uber wealthy. The U.S. has a shamefully low health care ranking when compared to the rest of the industrialized world as measured by both vitality and survival. Efficiency levels are woefully inadequate. Consider endocrine care alone. Virtually no one here feels they are getting anywhere near the care they ought to.and we or our insurance is paying through the teeth for the horrendous care we do get. We don't need "death panels" or "socialized medicine" to fix the problem. Medicare is neither of those things. We need to ask ourselves why universal access to Medicare was "taken off the table" on day one of the health insurance reform hearings. Eliminating graft is part of the solution and empowering patients another. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
This YouTube Video Shows How a Doctor Can Mess You Up
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top