ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Excel Male Lounge Forums
The Hang Out - Where Everything Goes!
The Scientific American Guide to Cheating in the Olympics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nelson Vergel" data-source="post: 83014" data-attributes="member: 3"><p>This is a super interesting article.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>"It seems reasonable to ask: Have we made any progress against doping in sports?</p><p>Well, yes and…not really. One the one hand, WADA-accredited labs processed an astounding 186,073 blood and urine samples in 2014, the most recent year for which figures are available. Slightly less than 1 percent of those came back with an “adverse” or “atypical” finding, jargon for a positive or suspicious result. That translates into a large number of positive tests—but contrast that figure with the 29 percent of athletes at a major international meet who, when promised anonymity by researchers, admitted to using PEDs. Clearly, plenty of cheaters are getting away with it."</p><p></p><p>Look at the figure in the <a href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-scientific-american-guide-to-cheating-in-the-olympics/" target="_blank">article</a>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nelson Vergel, post: 83014, member: 3"] This is a super interesting article. "It seems reasonable to ask: Have we made any progress against doping in sports? Well, yes and…not really. One the one hand, WADA-accredited labs processed an astounding 186,073 blood and urine samples in 2014, the most recent year for which figures are available. Slightly less than 1 percent of those came back with an “adverse” or “atypical” finding, jargon for a positive or suspicious result. That translates into a large number of positive tests—but contrast that figure with the 29 percent of athletes at a major international meet who, when promised anonymity by researchers, admitted to using PEDs. Clearly, plenty of cheaters are getting away with it." Look at the figure in the [URL="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-scientific-american-guide-to-cheating-in-the-olympics/"]article[/URL]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Excel Male Lounge Forums
The Hang Out - Where Everything Goes!
The Scientific American Guide to Cheating in the Olympics
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top