ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Expert Interviews
The Health Optimization Doctors RoundTable: High Hematocrit Not Important?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RobRoy" data-source="post: 257691" data-attributes="member: 42893"><p>Your lack of clinical experience shows every time you write something. You have no medical training and it shows every time you write something. You might be able to impress the little boys on forums but no one else. Like I've said before you might be some teenage boy living in Indonesia somewhere because no one knows who you are so one of you identify yourself and tell us about all of your medical training and your clinical experience dealing with hormones.</p><p>But to specifically address your question. If you notice in the trial it was basically a 50% drop out in both the placebo and the treatment arm. If they were to raise testosterone levels to optimal levels you would've seen that drop out. The maximum level was 750. Wow that's awesome. Everybody feels better with a level of 750 – – – not!. The Afib was that clinically significant? and was the study powered for that? You don't see anybody focusing on that in the national media even do you? Once again it raised a question but we can't ignore decades of other studies that show that testosterone decreases the instances of a fib because it shortens the QT interval. Once again read a lot to those that are in the know you absolutely reveal that you don't know what you don't know.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RobRoy, post: 257691, member: 42893"] Your lack of clinical experience shows every time you write something. You have no medical training and it shows every time you write something. You might be able to impress the little boys on forums but no one else. Like I've said before you might be some teenage boy living in Indonesia somewhere because no one knows who you are so one of you identify yourself and tell us about all of your medical training and your clinical experience dealing with hormones. But to specifically address your question. If you notice in the trial it was basically a 50% drop out in both the placebo and the treatment arm. If they were to raise testosterone levels to optimal levels you would've seen that drop out. The maximum level was 750. Wow that's awesome. Everybody feels better with a level of 750 – – – not!. The Afib was that clinically significant? and was the study powered for that? You don't see anybody focusing on that in the national media even do you? Once again it raised a question but we can't ignore decades of other studies that show that testosterone decreases the instances of a fib because it shortens the QT interval. Once again read a lot to those that are in the know you absolutely reveal that you don't know what you don't know. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Expert Interviews
The Health Optimization Doctors RoundTable: High Hematocrit Not Important?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top