ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Testosterone No Good After 28 Days???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cataceous" data-source="post: 204303" data-attributes="member: 38109"><p>Where these entities would get into trouble is if they specified a beyond use date greater than the default USP standard of 28 days without evidence of safety. The teeth for enforcement are in FDCA 502(g), which can actually include jail time. In reality Walgreens, etc. would never set such a policy. If you tried to pin them down then they would either cite the USP standard or more likely defer to their pharmacists. If pharmacists or prescribers invented a longer beyond use date without evidence then they could easily end up in trouble, though presumably at the state level. Tell me, what would Defy Medical say in writing about the beyond use dates for the vials they prescribe? Would they contradict the standard and say that a longer period is fine? I assume ambiguity is better. There's at least a smidgeon of deniability in not specifying a BUD but still prescribing in ways that ignore the default BUD. Or would they pass the buck to the compounding pharmacies?</p><p></p><p>None of this is to argue that the standard is not overly cautious, or that enforcement is likely. But it's not great to have the hammer of selective enforcement sitting out there waiting to be used by someone who has it in for you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cataceous, post: 204303, member: 38109"] Where these entities would get into trouble is if they specified a beyond use date greater than the default USP standard of 28 days without evidence of safety. The teeth for enforcement are in FDCA 502(g), which can actually include jail time. In reality Walgreens, etc. would never set such a policy. If you tried to pin them down then they would either cite the USP standard or more likely defer to their pharmacists. If pharmacists or prescribers invented a longer beyond use date without evidence then they could easily end up in trouble, though presumably at the state level. Tell me, what would Defy Medical say in writing about the beyond use dates for the vials they prescribe? Would they contradict the standard and say that a longer period is fine? I assume ambiguity is better. There's at least a smidgeon of deniability in not specifying a BUD but still prescribing in ways that ignore the default BUD. Or would they pass the buck to the compounding pharmacies? None of this is to argue that the standard is not overly cautious, or that enforcement is likely. But it's not great to have the hammer of selective enforcement sitting out there waiting to be used by someone who has it in for you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Testosterone No Good After 28 Days???
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top