ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Testosterone in athletes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="arsenio7" data-source="post: 230873" data-attributes="member: 44182"><p>Several articles are showing that many athletes have an FT that is debatably low.</p><p></p><p>Such in this one:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]24821[/ATTACH][URL unfurl="true"]http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-097792[/URL]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]24823[/ATTACH][URL unfurl="true"]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29445518/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>As an amateur marathoner (just about the 3hour for full-marathon), it seems that my endogenous FT (around 0.33 nmol/L) is acceptable.</p><p></p><p>It's well known that long-distance runners are having kinda low T/low FT.</p><p></p><p>But what amazes me the most is to see sprinters (0.39 nmol/L) which are usually kinda literally beasts of muscles having T which is pretty low compared to the normal population... but they still have outstanding explosiveness, quick power, recovery, and important muscle mass.</p><p></p><p>Is there a piece of the puzzle am I missing?</p><p></p><p>This post is a bit out-of-subject, but I'd be very interested in knowing the advice of the ExcelMale community members (who are actually always impressing me by the quality of their posts/responses)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="arsenio7, post: 230873, member: 44182"] Several articles are showing that many athletes have an FT that is debatably low. Such in this one: [ATTACH type="full"]24821[/ATTACH][URL unfurl="true"]http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-097792[/URL] [ATTACH type="full"]24823[/ATTACH][URL unfurl="true"]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29445518/[/URL] As an amateur marathoner (just about the 3hour for full-marathon), it seems that my endogenous FT (around 0.33 nmol/L) is acceptable. It's well known that long-distance runners are having kinda low T/low FT. But what amazes me the most is to see sprinters (0.39 nmol/L) which are usually kinda literally beasts of muscles having T which is pretty low compared to the normal population... but they still have outstanding explosiveness, quick power, recovery, and important muscle mass. Is there a piece of the puzzle am I missing? This post is a bit out-of-subject, but I'd be very interested in knowing the advice of the ExcelMale community members (who are actually always impressing me by the quality of their posts/responses) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Testosterone in athletes
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top