ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Peptide Forums (GHRH, Sermorelin, etc)
General Peptide Use & Information
Tesamorelin vs. Ipamorelin?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="madhacker" data-source="post: 172425" data-attributes="member: 37977"><p>LOL, you are a Valter D. Longo fan, now I understand your position. Valter doesn't believe in anything but supporting aging through lifestyle factors. I respect Valter, though the 2011 study you posted is one of four that are published by him supporting IGF and cancer risk and there are roughly 22 supporting cancer protective effects.</p><p></p><p>We could do this all day. I have provided an article that has sufficient new research supporting the benefits of restoring physiological levels of GH and IGF in aging people. Here's another one showing IGF-1 given late in life improving health span.</p><p></p><p>The reason I responded to your post is because I think it's irresponsible to give people advice, in absolutes. Your position as Valter's is only a hypothesis. There's a lot of new research supporting IGF's beneficial effects on health span. You can look up Nelson's posts on the subject as well. </p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04805-5" target="_blank">Late-life targeting of the IGF-1 receptor improves healthspan and lifespan in female mice</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="madhacker, post: 172425, member: 37977"] LOL, you are a Valter D. Longo fan, now I understand your position. Valter doesn't believe in anything but supporting aging through lifestyle factors. I respect Valter, though the 2011 study you posted is one of four that are published by him supporting IGF and cancer risk and there are roughly 22 supporting cancer protective effects. We could do this all day. I have provided an article that has sufficient new research supporting the benefits of restoring physiological levels of GH and IGF in aging people. Here's another one showing IGF-1 given late in life improving health span. The reason I responded to your post is because I think it's irresponsible to give people advice, in absolutes. Your position as Valter's is only a hypothesis. There's a lot of new research supporting IGF's beneficial effects on health span. You can look up Nelson's posts on the subject as well. [URL="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04805-5"]Late-life targeting of the IGF-1 receptor improves healthspan and lifespan in female mice[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Peptide Forums (GHRH, Sermorelin, etc)
General Peptide Use & Information
Tesamorelin vs. Ipamorelin?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top