ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
t/e2 ratio off optimal ratio
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HoustonTX" data-source="post: 31440" data-attributes="member: 12463"><p>I agree. The only thing that I would say is that when you feel good and your sexual function is great and you get your blood drawn that day with the idea that the results will tell you what your personal optimal levels should be, then my goal is to strive to find a protocol to consistently match those numbers (not exactly but within a reasonable range). The last time that happened for me, I was at a test of 1134 and a sensitive E2 of 33. The regular E2 was also run and had me at 35. So, when trying to find an optimal protocol that will find you consistently feeling good, doesn't it make sense to find one that will keep you in the range that you felt good in when you got tested...no matter what the ratio theory says? My point being that there is a correlation between numbers and how we "feel" and how well we function sexually. Personally, my test results which have varied from 900-1200 for the most part have always made me feel good. My E2 levels which have been all over the place have only made me function well sexually when in the 20-40 range, and it didn't matter what the test level was. I believe the ratio theory is very valuable, but it starts to lose it's value for me when my E2 is above 40.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HoustonTX, post: 31440, member: 12463"] I agree. The only thing that I would say is that when you feel good and your sexual function is great and you get your blood drawn that day with the idea that the results will tell you what your personal optimal levels should be, then my goal is to strive to find a protocol to consistently match those numbers (not exactly but within a reasonable range). The last time that happened for me, I was at a test of 1134 and a sensitive E2 of 33. The regular E2 was also run and had me at 35. So, when trying to find an optimal protocol that will find you consistently feeling good, doesn't it make sense to find one that will keep you in the range that you felt good in when you got tested...no matter what the ratio theory says? My point being that there is a correlation between numbers and how we "feel" and how well we function sexually. Personally, my test results which have varied from 900-1200 for the most part have always made me feel good. My E2 levels which have been all over the place have only made me function well sexually when in the 20-40 range, and it didn't matter what the test level was. I believe the ratio theory is very valuable, but it starts to lose it's value for me when my E2 is above 40. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
t/e2 ratio off optimal ratio
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top