This is a slightly different point but I figured this was a good thread to post it in.
Isn’t it interesting that men and clinics always say they want high normal T levels but never say they want high normal E levels (usually wanting low or medium)?
This is even among the men and clinics that acknowledge “oh hey E is important and has health benefits, we shouldn’t crash it to 0”, but still push AIs to push levels into the low or medium range.
This widespread practice phenomenon and practice basically assumes that E, although not evil, is still not as “good” or “healthy” as T.
Is there really any evidence to suggest that high normal E levels are any less healthy as high normal T levels?
