ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Side Effect Management
Subq vs IM impact on Hematocrit
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MarkM" data-source="post: 206792"><p>[USER=13851]@madman[/USER] "<em><strong><u>Preliminary results showed that a device with 1:1 sample-to-buffer volume had the most comparable results to those obtained from the standard dialyzer, with the mean bias less than 15%</u>. </strong></em><strong><em>The device with the highest sample-to-buffer ratio showed bias as high as 50%. <u>These data suggest that controlling the sample-to-buffer ratio is a critical step in the ED FT method</u>."</em></strong></p><p></p><p>15% to 50% is a huge variance depending on the device/method used. Do you think once this study is completed it will change the lower and upper ranges that the medical field uses for Total and FT? Should FT levels be used more in determining if an individual should be placed on TRT verse Total T which is it what it seems the medical field focuses on. Very interesting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MarkM, post: 206792"] [USER=13851]@madman[/USER] "[I][B][U]Preliminary results showed that a device with 1:1 sample-to-buffer volume had the most comparable results to those obtained from the standard dialyzer, with the mean bias less than 15%[/U]. [/B][/I][B][I]The device with the highest sample-to-buffer ratio showed bias as high as 50%. [U]These data suggest that controlling the sample-to-buffer ratio is a critical step in the ED FT method[/U]."[/I][/B] 15% to 50% is a huge variance depending on the device/method used. Do you think once this study is completed it will change the lower and upper ranges that the medical field uses for Total and FT? Should FT levels be used more in determining if an individual should be placed on TRT verse Total T which is it what it seems the medical field focuses on. Very interesting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Side Effect Management
Subq vs IM impact on Hematocrit
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top