ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Blood Test Discussion
SubQ might not doing it for me
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cataceous" data-source="post: 142937" data-attributes="member: 38109"><p>That's absolutely what I'm saying, though I'm talking about average levels within an individual. Obviously different individuals can get vastly different serum levels from the same doses. The anecdotal stuff is next to useless, because it's mostly single measurements, and these are even in theory different between subQ and IM. Add in the measurement variations and noise and you can have people believing virtually anything.</p><p></p><p>Now in arguing my case I am neglecting possible subtleties, slight variations in MCR caused by differing hormone levels over time, etc. But the evidence suggests these effects are small, and the message most guys should get is that your average testosterone level is proportional to your doses, and average testosterone levels are basically going to be the same for subQ and IM. This doesn't mean the outcome is necessarily the same. Peaks and troughs are dampened with subQ, which is more significant as the injection cycle gets to be on the order of the ester half-life and beyond. It's starting to go beyond speculation that peak hormone levels may have an importance of their own.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cataceous, post: 142937, member: 38109"] That's absolutely what I'm saying, though I'm talking about average levels within an individual. Obviously different individuals can get vastly different serum levels from the same doses. The anecdotal stuff is next to useless, because it's mostly single measurements, and these are even in theory different between subQ and IM. Add in the measurement variations and noise and you can have people believing virtually anything. Now in arguing my case I am neglecting possible subtleties, slight variations in MCR caused by differing hormone levels over time, etc. But the evidence suggests these effects are small, and the message most guys should get is that your average testosterone level is proportional to your doses, and average testosterone levels are basically going to be the same for subQ and IM. This doesn't mean the outcome is necessarily the same. Peaks and troughs are dampened with subQ, which is more significant as the injection cycle gets to be on the order of the ester half-life and beyond. It's starting to go beyond speculation that peak hormone levels may have an importance of their own. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Blood Test Discussion
SubQ might not doing it for me
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top