ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone and Men's Health Articles
Subcutaneous vs intramuscular testosterone study- ( abraham morgentaler )
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="madman" data-source="post: 92630" data-attributes="member: 13851"><p>It would make more sense that one group will start on subcutaneous (?)mg/week for 4 weeks and than switch over to im (?) mg/week for 4 weeks and the other group vice versa as there would be no point in one injection whether sub-q or im as 4 weeks after injection testosterone levels would be crashed.</p><p></p><p>It is stated that endpoint measurements (primary outcomes) for changes in tt and calculated free t is 4 weeks and endpoint measurements (secondary) for changes in estradiol/lh/fsh/shbg/psa/hematocrit/low testosterone questionnaire responses and international prostate symptom scores is 4 weeks.</p><p></p><p>I would think results for the endpoint measurements would be skewed if each group only was injected once sub-q than im and vice versa.</p><p></p><p>You are right that a longer study of each injection method would be better 6-8 weeks and specific details of the study are vague.</p><p></p><p>Morgentaler is well respected in the field of trt so I would think he knows what he is doing!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="madman, post: 92630, member: 13851"] It would make more sense that one group will start on subcutaneous (?)mg/week for 4 weeks and than switch over to im (?) mg/week for 4 weeks and the other group vice versa as there would be no point in one injection whether sub-q or im as 4 weeks after injection testosterone levels would be crashed. It is stated that endpoint measurements (primary outcomes) for changes in tt and calculated free t is 4 weeks and endpoint measurements (secondary) for changes in estradiol/lh/fsh/shbg/psa/hematocrit/low testosterone questionnaire responses and international prostate symptom scores is 4 weeks. I would think results for the endpoint measurements would be skewed if each group only was injected once sub-q than im and vice versa. You are right that a longer study of each injection method would be better 6-8 weeks and specific details of the study are vague. Morgentaler is well respected in the field of trt so I would think he knows what he is doing! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone and Men's Health Articles
Subcutaneous vs intramuscular testosterone study- ( abraham morgentaler )
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top