ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone and Men's Health Articles
Subcutaneous vs intramuscular testosterone study- ( abraham morgentaler )
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blackhawk" data-source="post: 92627" data-attributes="member: 16042"><p>Methodolgy seem a bit under thought out. At least what's written is unclear.</p><p></p><p>"<span style="color: #333333">One group will receive <strong>a</strong> SQ injection followed by <strong>an</strong> IM injection and one group will receive <strong>an</strong> IM injection followed by <strong>a</strong> SQ injection. "</span></p><p></p><p>So this implies basing data on single doses and not accounting for half life and reaching stable state on either method.</p><p></p><p>But further in the info it states 4 weeks. It is unclear whether they are administering a single injection then measuring at weeks out which seems ludicrous, or keeping subjects on consistent dosing for 4 weeks. But then we know that based on 1/2 life, they really should be testing after 6 weeks of consistent therapy using one method.</p><p></p><p>How about IM for 6 weeks then measure, then switch to SubQ for 6 weeks and measure... and vice versa?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blackhawk, post: 92627, member: 16042"] Methodolgy seem a bit under thought out. At least what's written is unclear. "[COLOR=#333333][FONT='inherit']One group will receive [B]a[/B] SQ injection followed by [B]an[/B] IM injection and one group will receive [B]an[/B] IM injection followed by [B]a[/B] SQ injection. "[/FONT][/COLOR] So this implies basing data on single doses and not accounting for half life and reaching stable state on either method. But further in the info it states 4 weeks. It is unclear whether they are administering a single injection then measuring at weeks out which seems ludicrous, or keeping subjects on consistent dosing for 4 weeks. But then we know that based on 1/2 life, they really should be testing after 6 weeks of consistent therapy using one method. How about IM for 6 weeks then measure, then switch to SubQ for 6 weeks and measure... and vice versa? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone and Men's Health Articles
Subcutaneous vs intramuscular testosterone study- ( abraham morgentaler )
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top