ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
subcutaneous injection into stomach
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blackhawk" data-source="post: 233367" data-attributes="member: 16042"><p>Thanks for sharing your experience. I was wondering from your first post if you were just a troll. This is a much better approach to communicating about the SubQ vs IM issue than your original post.</p><p></p><p>Your experience is valid. It is also N=1, but you probably will be happy to know that there are others who also do not do well with SubQ. This topic has been discussed ad nauseum on this forum. </p><p></p><p>So, your experience is is valid for you and some others, but quite contrary to mine, and many others and research statistics. You are not the only one who seemingly doesn't do well with SubQ. It is demonstrative of the heterogeneous nature of TRT between different individuals. Glad you have found what does and does not work FOR YOU. Sorry that it caused you such frustration. Please accept that this is your problem but is not for many of us. </p><p></p><p>The solution is simple, stick with IM.</p><p></p><p>I really have no idea, but I'll offer up one rhetorical theory. I am very lean, and I do not inject into my larger fat pads, but really my depots end up subQ not intrafat. I do not know into what tissue those who are unsuccessful with SubQ are injecting. In my mind it is possible that injecting into larger fat masses could end up in the T being stored in the fat rather than metabolized.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blackhawk, post: 233367, member: 16042"] Thanks for sharing your experience. I was wondering from your first post if you were just a troll. This is a much better approach to communicating about the SubQ vs IM issue than your original post. Your experience is valid. It is also N=1, but you probably will be happy to know that there are others who also do not do well with SubQ. This topic has been discussed ad nauseum on this forum. So, your experience is is valid for you and some others, but quite contrary to mine, and many others and research statistics. You are not the only one who seemingly doesn't do well with SubQ. It is demonstrative of the heterogeneous nature of TRT between different individuals. Glad you have found what does and does not work FOR YOU. Sorry that it caused you such frustration. Please accept that this is your problem but is not for many of us. The solution is simple, stick with IM. I really have no idea, but I'll offer up one rhetorical theory. I am very lean, and I do not inject into my larger fat pads, but really my depots end up subQ not intrafat. I do not know into what tissue those who are unsuccessful with SubQ are injecting. In my mind it is possible that injecting into larger fat masses could end up in the T being stored in the fat rather than metabolized. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
subcutaneous injection into stomach
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top