ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Sub Q injections quit working
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fortunate" data-source="post: 208072" data-attributes="member: 42264"><p>Not true. The best available information should guide decision making. If there is data derived from a well designed study (I have an old post on levels of scientific rigor), then logic demands us to pay attention to that data. Although I could be wrong, I am going to go out on a limb and say that I doubt anyone has conducted a double blinded, randomized study to evaluate what preparations are more likely to cause said skin nodules and irritation. If you believe in using the best available information, then there are plenty of circumstances in which the only information is anecdotal. </p><p></p><p>I am pretty sure [USER=38109]@Cataceous[/USER] even said there is a role for using anecdotal information above. He isn’t above discounting it. Yet, some think it is appropriate to discount information derived in a controlled, disciplined way just because the personal experience of some people doesn’t match what the science says. </p><p></p><p>Calling this a double standard feels like we are now arguing for the sake of winning - not for trying to understand each other’s views.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fortunate, post: 208072, member: 42264"] Not true. The best available information should guide decision making. If there is data derived from a well designed study (I have an old post on levels of scientific rigor), then logic demands us to pay attention to that data. Although I could be wrong, I am going to go out on a limb and say that I doubt anyone has conducted a double blinded, randomized study to evaluate what preparations are more likely to cause said skin nodules and irritation. If you believe in using the best available information, then there are plenty of circumstances in which the only information is anecdotal. I am pretty sure [USER=38109]@Cataceous[/USER] even said there is a role for using anecdotal information above. He isn’t above discounting it. Yet, some think it is appropriate to discount information derived in a controlled, disciplined way just because the personal experience of some people doesn’t match what the science says. Calling this a double standard feels like we are now arguing for the sake of winning - not for trying to understand each other’s views. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Sub Q injections quit working
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top