ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
ExcelFemale
HRT in Women
Study Conclusions Reversed: HRT vindicated in new JAMA article
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nelson Vergel" data-source="post: 83240" data-attributes="member: 3"><p>A new article in JAMA (September 12, 2017) reverses the outcome of the (2002) WHI study that brought the entire Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) field to its knees by reviewing all-cause mortality of the 27,000 women followed for eighteen years who were the original study participants. According to the statistical review by the principal investigators of the 2002 WHI study, the women who were taking hormones (non bioidentical, only Premarin and Provera) did not die earlier or have higher incidence of chronic illnesses than those taking placebo. In fact, because they took hormones, they did better than the women on placebo by improving the quality of their lives, even preventing osteoporosis, heart disease and Alzheimers, increasing sexual satisfaction and eliminating hot flashes and night sweats.</p><p></p><p>But the medical establishment knew that in the 1960s, 70s, 80s and even 90s. HRT was evidence based state of the art treatment for menopause then. Not giving women HRT would have been considered medically improper then.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/principal-investigators-of-2002-whi-study-reverse-findings_us_59bf0771e4b06b71800c3aed" target="_blank">More</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nelson Vergel, post: 83240, member: 3"] A new article in JAMA (September 12, 2017) reverses the outcome of the (2002) WHI study that brought the entire Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) field to its knees by reviewing all-cause mortality of the 27,000 women followed for eighteen years who were the original study participants. According to the statistical review by the principal investigators of the 2002 WHI study, the women who were taking hormones (non bioidentical, only Premarin and Provera) did not die earlier or have higher incidence of chronic illnesses than those taking placebo. In fact, because they took hormones, they did better than the women on placebo by improving the quality of their lives, even preventing osteoporosis, heart disease and Alzheimers, increasing sexual satisfaction and eliminating hot flashes and night sweats. But the medical establishment knew that in the 1960s, 70s, 80s and even 90s. HRT was evidence based state of the art treatment for menopause then. Not giving women HRT would have been considered medically improper then. [URL="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/principal-investigators-of-2002-whi-study-reverse-findings_us_59bf0771e4b06b71800c3aed"]More[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
ExcelFemale
HRT in Women
Study Conclusions Reversed: HRT vindicated in new JAMA article
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top