ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone and Men's Health Articles
Some Results of Long Term Testosterone Therapy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="johndoesmith" data-source="post: 57368" data-attributes="member: 13404"><p>I completely agree with you, the researchers use these poor protocols like 200mg E14D, which is extremely outdated, not to mention cookie cutter, and there's no mention of dialing in E2 amongst other hormones, nor is there any E2 measurements AFAIK. </p><p></p><p>I'd love to see what that study you're referring to would be like if they used an INDIVIDUALIZED protocol for each, with more modern protocols like 60mg E3.5D or even EOD for low SHBG guys, and dialing in of E2 using LC/MS-MS testing. </p><p></p><p>What's impressive is even with that poor excuse of a protocol, the men had vast improvements. </p><p></p><p>Although I imagine the problem is with the variance in individual protocols by definition not being standardized, which is a problem for research. </p><p></p><p>This study in the OP is a bit more modern, but still only evaluated total testosterone, no mention of E2, and used E84D injections of nebido which according to nebido leaves most men around 450-500ish from week 6-12. </p><p></p><p>Not exactly what many of us here would be happy with.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="johndoesmith, post: 57368, member: 13404"] I completely agree with you, the researchers use these poor protocols like 200mg E14D, which is extremely outdated, not to mention cookie cutter, and there's no mention of dialing in E2 amongst other hormones, nor is there any E2 measurements AFAIK. I'd love to see what that study you're referring to would be like if they used an INDIVIDUALIZED protocol for each, with more modern protocols like 60mg E3.5D or even EOD for low SHBG guys, and dialing in of E2 using LC/MS-MS testing. What's impressive is even with that poor excuse of a protocol, the men had vast improvements. Although I imagine the problem is with the variance in individual protocols by definition not being standardized, which is a problem for research. This study in the OP is a bit more modern, but still only evaluated total testosterone, no mention of E2, and used E84D injections of nebido which according to nebido leaves most men around 450-500ish from week 6-12. Not exactly what many of us here would be happy with. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone and Men's Health Articles
Some Results of Long Term Testosterone Therapy
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top