ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Shallow Testosterone IM versus SubQ Injections - Lab Results
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bixt" data-source="post: 211514" data-attributes="member: 39921"><p>Stop acting like an emo teenage girl. This aint instagram.</p><p></p><p>Condecending words like "piss poor" and "BRUH" are unbecoming of a moderator. </p><p></p><p>Please stick to the science, we all really do enjoy your writeups, which are top notch. But shooting down others ideas emotively is a big turn off. You will win way more people over with a soft and kind approach.</p><p></p><p>As to the whole subq/im FT/TT levels issue, a lot of fingers are absolutely pointing in the direction for further research. The books are not closed and the knowledge of TRT is not absolute and complete. Stop trying to be the final word on this issue. </p><p></p><p>Lets ignore the FT issue. There is def some TT "missing" which has been "lost", vanished into thin air, for some men. In those men, where has it dissapeared? There are lots of examples as I keep saying across various boards. </p><p></p><p>While on average the studies may show similar levels, they may not show the variabity for each sample between IM/subq. Im sure there are many such outliers. Perhaps these are the "special cases", and lets not forget its the special cases seeking help here! </p><p></p><p>Keep an open mind, this hypothesis is developing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bixt, post: 211514, member: 39921"] Stop acting like an emo teenage girl. This aint instagram. Condecending words like "piss poor" and "BRUH" are unbecoming of a moderator. Please stick to the science, we all really do enjoy your writeups, which are top notch. But shooting down others ideas emotively is a big turn off. You will win way more people over with a soft and kind approach. As to the whole subq/im FT/TT levels issue, a lot of fingers are absolutely pointing in the direction for further research. The books are not closed and the knowledge of TRT is not absolute and complete. Stop trying to be the final word on this issue. Lets ignore the FT issue. There is def some TT "missing" which has been "lost", vanished into thin air, for some men. In those men, where has it dissapeared? There are lots of examples as I keep saying across various boards. While on average the studies may show similar levels, they may not show the variabity for each sample between IM/subq. Im sure there are many such outliers. Perhaps these are the "special cases", and lets not forget its the special cases seeking help here! Keep an open mind, this hypothesis is developing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Shallow Testosterone IM versus SubQ Injections - Lab Results
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top