ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Shallow Testosterone IM versus SubQ Injections - Lab Results
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="madman" data-source="post: 211469" data-attributes="member: 13851"><p>The point that was being stressed is that you stated his<em><strong> FT levels dropped drastically</strong></em> yet it was tested using the piss poor direct immunoassay which is known to be inaccurate.</p><p></p><p>You never once question the assay used.....<em>Getting back to the original post, did you notice any effect on your libido when you<strong> switched to subq considering the significant drop in TT/FT?</strong></em></p><p></p><p>Notice the part I highlighted in your original reply.</p><p></p><p>Everyone is so quick to jump the gun.</p><p></p><p>You and many long-time members have been on here long enough to know let alone had been given sensible advice numerous times even when it comes to testing FT.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>*<u>MIP1950</u>.....over 5 years in</strong></p><p></p><p><em>I can only add my praise for your </em><strong><em>meticulous comparison analysis</em>.</strong><em> Some, or many of us, wouldn't have the time or inclination to be so methodical. I also read the article on Testosterone Nation about the study at one of the medical centers in the University of California system. It never stated where, specifically, since I wanted to read the study, so you conducted your own study. Good job!</em></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>*<u>Gman86</u>.....well over 4 years in</strong></p><p></p><p><em>This post is honestly amazing. Thank u so much for doing such a detailed experiment. It’s extremely impressive how well<strong> u kept all the variables the same.</strong> If only people conducting studies had ur brain. I would put much more weight into them. But anyways, obv ur results are exactly that, ur results, and they may vary person to person<strong><em> running this exact experiment.</em></strong> But at the same time, ur results are extremely important, and can really help the HRT community, <strong><em>especially if more guys ran this exact same experiment,</em></strong> and we found similar trends in others. Thanks again for doing this and making this post for everyone to see, I personally really appreciate it.</em></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>*<u>S1W</u>.....4.5 years in</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong><em>never once questioned the assay used</em></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>*<u>You</u>.....2.5 years in</strong></p><p></p><p><em>Great stuff. Appreciate you having the discipline to </em><strong><em>eliminate the variables,</em></strong><em> especially the supplements. Count me surprised by the subq TT number based on 24mg daily!</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Getting back to the original post, did you notice any effect on your libido when you <strong>switched to subq considering the<u> significant drop</u> in TT/FT?</strong></em></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><em><u>solothesensei</u>.....rookie, long time trt user (who knows)</em></strong></p><p></p><p><em><strong>His post speaks for itself</strong></em></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Everyone jumped in headfirst and no one questioned the assay used!</p><p></p><p>Hard to believe especially when it has been beaten to death on the forum over the years.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="madman, post: 211469, member: 13851"] The point that was being stressed is that you stated his[I][B] FT levels dropped drastically[/B][/I] yet it was tested using the piss poor direct immunoassay which is known to be inaccurate. You never once question the assay used.....[I]Getting back to the original post, did you notice any effect on your libido when you[B] switched to subq considering the significant drop in TT/FT?[/B][/I] Notice the part I highlighted in your original reply. Everyone is so quick to jump the gun. You and many long-time members have been on here long enough to know let alone had been given sensible advice numerous times even when it comes to testing FT. [B]*[U]MIP1950[/U].....over 5 years in[/B] [I]I can only add my praise for your [/I][B][I]meticulous comparison analysis[/I].[/B][I] Some, or many of us, wouldn't have the time or inclination to be so methodical. I also read the article on Testosterone Nation about the study at one of the medical centers in the University of California system. It never stated where, specifically, since I wanted to read the study, so you conducted your own study. Good job![/I] [B]*[U]Gman86[/U].....well over 4 years in[/B] [I]This post is honestly amazing. Thank u so much for doing such a detailed experiment. It’s extremely impressive how well[B] u kept all the variables the same.[/B] If only people conducting studies had ur brain. I would put much more weight into them. But anyways, obv ur results are exactly that, ur results, and they may vary person to person[B][I] running this exact experiment.[/I][/B] But at the same time, ur results are extremely important, and can really help the HRT community, [B][I]especially if more guys ran this exact same experiment,[/I][/B] and we found similar trends in others. Thanks again for doing this and making this post for everyone to see, I personally really appreciate it.[/I] [B]*[U]S1W[/U].....4.5 years in [I]never once questioned the assay used[/I] *[U]You[/U].....2.5 years in[/B] [I]Great stuff. Appreciate you having the discipline to [/I][B][I]eliminate the variables,[/I][/B][I] especially the supplements. Count me surprised by the subq TT number based on 24mg daily! Getting back to the original post, did you notice any effect on your libido when you [B]switched to subq considering the[U] significant drop[/U] in TT/FT?[/B][/I] [B][I][U]solothesensei[/U].....rookie, long time trt user (who knows)[/I][/B] [I][B]His post speaks for itself[/B][/I] Everyone jumped in headfirst and no one questioned the assay used! Hard to believe especially when it has been beaten to death on the forum over the years. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Shallow Testosterone IM versus SubQ Injections - Lab Results
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top