ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Shallow Testosterone IM versus SubQ Injections - Lab Results
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="solothesensei" data-source="post: 211432" data-attributes="member: 43130"><p>MarkM, thanks for your valuable insights. You did a huge service to all of us by posting those results. Here's my personal analysis on your subq experiment:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>TT falling was to be expected.</strong> Subq depots are absorbed more slowly into the bloodstream after all. What's interesting was it fell by over 20%.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>FT fell without a corresponding rise in SHBG.</strong> This is puzzling if the labs are at least directionally accurate. I can only imagine 2 possibilities - either albumin changed drastically, or the FT measurement using LC-MS was inaccurate like Cataceous has attested to.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>E2 and DHT staying the same was surprising as well. </strong>Especially since both have to come from a much smaller pool of FT. I have no explanation for this other than an increase in aromatase and 5AR for some reason.</li> </ul><p>Really thought-provoking results especially on the 2nd and 3rd bullet points.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="solothesensei, post: 211432, member: 43130"] MarkM, thanks for your valuable insights. You did a huge service to all of us by posting those results. Here's my personal analysis on your subq experiment: [LIST] [*][B]TT falling was to be expected.[/B] Subq depots are absorbed more slowly into the bloodstream after all. What's interesting was it fell by over 20%. [*][B]FT fell without a corresponding rise in SHBG.[/B] This is puzzling if the labs are at least directionally accurate. I can only imagine 2 possibilities - either albumin changed drastically, or the FT measurement using LC-MS was inaccurate like Cataceous has attested to. [*][B]E2 and DHT staying the same was surprising as well. [/B]Especially since both have to come from a much smaller pool of FT. I have no explanation for this other than an increase in aromatase and 5AR for some reason. [/LIST] Really thought-provoking results especially on the 2nd and 3rd bullet points. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Shallow Testosterone IM versus SubQ Injections - Lab Results
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top