ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Shallow Testosterone IM versus SubQ Injections - Lab Results
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tareload" data-source="post: 211333"><p>You don't have to defend yourself. I am as picky as they come and you did a great job with the experiment from a PK standpoint. There are well-respected Doctors (well known on here) that use the direct RIA fT method and as has been pointed out nth number of times it's nothing more than a windsock at best. That doesn't stop them; they are set in their ways.</p><p></p><p>With the data you shared if one wants they can take your TT and SHBG (and albumin) and calculate your fT till the cows come home with whatever method they desire. I've still got a running bet with [USER=13851]@madman[/USER] that harmonized fT will come out closer to Vermeulen than tru-T but I don't know and he doesn't know either. Your TT method is just fine given your absolute numerical position in range (value) and you stayed consistent with the assay. I appreciate your time.</p><p></p><p>In fact, if you look at your bioavailable T values, that's where they came from... Vermeulen method:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]17393[/ATTACH]</p><p>[ATTACH=full]17394[/ATTACH]</p><p>Wasn't able to reconcile your free T %tiles with what you posted above. Clearly they aren't derived from direct fT numbers and TT <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tareload, post: 211333"] You don't have to defend yourself. I am as picky as they come and you did a great job with the experiment from a PK standpoint. There are well-respected Doctors (well known on here) that use the direct RIA fT method and as has been pointed out nth number of times it's nothing more than a windsock at best. That doesn't stop them; they are set in their ways. With the data you shared if one wants they can take your TT and SHBG (and albumin) and calculate your fT till the cows come home with whatever method they desire. I've still got a running bet with [USER=13851]@madman[/USER] that harmonized fT will come out closer to Vermeulen than tru-T but I don't know and he doesn't know either. Your TT method is just fine given your absolute numerical position in range (value) and you stayed consistent with the assay. I appreciate your time. In fact, if you look at your bioavailable T values, that's where they came from... Vermeulen method: [ATTACH type="full" alt="1635897988842.png"]17393[/ATTACH] [ATTACH type="full" alt="1635898005267.png"]17394[/ATTACH] Wasn't able to reconcile your free T %tiles with what you posted above. Clearly they aren't derived from direct fT numbers and TT :). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Shallow Testosterone IM versus SubQ Injections - Lab Results
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top