ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Shallow Testosterone IM versus SubQ Injections - Lab Results
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="madman" data-source="post: 211332" data-attributes="member: 13851"><p><strong><em>Well, it was not my intent to run my study for 2 years, nor for three of four months. It was for 9 to 10 weeks and that is what I did. If you wish to run studies that you partake for 3 to 4 months or 2 years, go for it.</em></strong> </p><p></p><p>2 years LOL.</p><p></p><p>Regarding how one truly feels when tweaking a protocol you very well know that 12 weeks has been stated numerous times over the years!</p><p></p><p></p><p><em><strong>But, guess what? I ran this study for me, not you. I did it my way and whether you like it or not, I feel just fine about the steps I took to remove variables. As long as I am happy knowing what all the facts are then I'm good with that. I really don't care if you agree or not.</strong></em></p><p></p><p>Like I said you put in the effort and I applaud you but the s**t kicker of the trial was comparing labs using inaccurate assays especially FT.</p><p></p><p>Yes, at least you had given it 9.5 weeks.....longer than most but would prefer to give a protocol 12 weeks to make a fair assessment let alone for one to claim success or failure on such.</p><p></p><p>You should have known better that when it comes to testing using accurate assays is critical yet you turned a blind eye as do many others.</p><p></p><p>No excuse as you have been on the forum long enough.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><em>For the record, in the future, I will no longer share information with this forum. instead of it being a sharing situation I feel like I have to defend myself which is bullshit.</em></strong></p><p></p><p>Sad you feel that way and I apologize if I come across as harsh as you should very well know I am str8 to the point.</p><p></p><p>I am going to pick apart flaws I see that need to be pointed out to prevent people from making the same mistakes.</p><p></p><p>You used inaccurate assays plain and simple.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="madman, post: 211332, member: 13851"] [B][I]Well, it was not my intent to run my study for 2 years, nor for three of four months. It was for 9 to 10 weeks and that is what I did. If you wish to run studies that you partake for 3 to 4 months or 2 years, go for it.[/I][/B] 2 years LOL. Regarding how one truly feels when tweaking a protocol you very well know that 12 weeks has been stated numerous times over the years! [I][B]But, guess what? I ran this study for me, not you. I did it my way and whether you like it or not, I feel just fine about the steps I took to remove variables. As long as I am happy knowing what all the facts are then I'm good with that. I really don't care if you agree or not.[/B][/I] Like I said you put in the effort and I applaud you but the s**t kicker of the trial was comparing labs using inaccurate assays especially FT.[I][B][/B][/I] [B][I][/I][/B] Yes, at least you had given it 9.5 weeks.....longer than most but would prefer to give a protocol 12 weeks to make a fair assessment let alone for one to claim success or failure on such. You should have known better that when it comes to testing using accurate assays is critical yet you turned a blind eye as do many others. No excuse as you have been on the forum long enough. [B][I]For the record, in the future, I will no longer share information with this forum. instead of it being a sharing situation I feel like I have to defend myself which is bullshit.[/I][/B] Sad you feel that way and I apologize if I come across as harsh as you should very well know I am str8 to the point. I am going to pick apart flaws I see that need to be pointed out to prevent people from making the same mistakes. You used inaccurate assays plain and simple. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Shallow Testosterone IM versus SubQ Injections - Lab Results
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top