ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Sensitive E2 in the 100’s
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TRTARNP" data-source="post: 198697" data-attributes="member: 42356"><p>Thanks for the response! Yes HcG use in both men. One is young, and desiring fertility. So he needs HcG, and is using 500 IUs three times weekly. The other also is using HcG, 500 IUs twice weekly. I have routinely started men on both test cyp and HcG, and maybe in the non fertility crowd, I would be better off holding off on HcG use, and only using it if they develop testicular pain or are bothered by the mild atrophy. </p><p></p><p>I think you are right, reducing dose is a great first step. The uncharted territory you elude makes me nervous, but at the same time, I really don’t like to use AIs to manage numbers, versus adding them to manage specific issues in the context of elevated LC/MS lab assessments. But the 100 range feels uncomfortable, and there isn’t a playbook or base of primary literature to fall back on with this issue. I know the Scott Howells, Kieth Nichols, Jordan Grants of the world, all individuals I highly respect, favor not using AIs... But with levels that elevated I get somewhat uncertain. </p><p></p><p>Any other thoughts or ideas are appreciated. Again, I reallly appreicate this forum as a means to learn things in areas that are not covered well or at all through traditional sources of medical information.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TRTARNP, post: 198697, member: 42356"] Thanks for the response! Yes HcG use in both men. One is young, and desiring fertility. So he needs HcG, and is using 500 IUs three times weekly. The other also is using HcG, 500 IUs twice weekly. I have routinely started men on both test cyp and HcG, and maybe in the non fertility crowd, I would be better off holding off on HcG use, and only using it if they develop testicular pain or are bothered by the mild atrophy. I think you are right, reducing dose is a great first step. The uncharted territory you elude makes me nervous, but at the same time, I really don’t like to use AIs to manage numbers, versus adding them to manage specific issues in the context of elevated LC/MS lab assessments. But the 100 range feels uncomfortable, and there isn’t a playbook or base of primary literature to fall back on with this issue. I know the Scott Howells, Kieth Nichols, Jordan Grants of the world, all individuals I highly respect, favor not using AIs... But with levels that elevated I get somewhat uncertain. Any other thoughts or ideas are appreciated. Again, I reallly appreicate this forum as a means to learn things in areas that are not covered well or at all through traditional sources of medical information. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
Sensitive E2 in the 100’s
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top