ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Side Effect Management
Seeking clarification from AI opponents
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CoastWatcher" data-source="post: 141853" data-attributes="member: 2624"><p>There are abundant threads on the use of an AI as part of a TRT protocol here at Exclemale. I think it’s fair to state that Nelson, as early as 2014, was questioning the over-prescribing of anastrozole as detrimental. </p><p></p><p>My own doctor argues that an AI should be introduced when clinical presentation demands it and other options to sort estradiol-related issues have been unsuccessful (efforts such as injection schedule and dose manipulation). Anastrozole is a good drug, a necessary drug for some patients, but it has been prescribed far too liberally. </p><p></p><p>To my mind, that is a common sense approach to the use of AIs. Some men certainly need them, far more will not. The only way to know which group you belong to will be to see how your progress unfolds once your protocol is in place. There is no magic number/sweet spot that rings a bell and mandates an anastrozole prescription. How you feel, what your labs reflect, and the clinical experience of your doctor will determine the need for e2 intervention. </p><p></p><p>This isn’t a religious or political debate, despite the tone that has developed when this subject is raised.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CoastWatcher, post: 141853, member: 2624"] There are abundant threads on the use of an AI as part of a TRT protocol here at Exclemale. I think it’s fair to state that Nelson, as early as 2014, was questioning the over-prescribing of anastrozole as detrimental. My own doctor argues that an AI should be introduced when clinical presentation demands it and other options to sort estradiol-related issues have been unsuccessful (efforts such as injection schedule and dose manipulation). Anastrozole is a good drug, a necessary drug for some patients, but it has been prescribed far too liberally. To my mind, that is a common sense approach to the use of AIs. Some men certainly need them, far more will not. The only way to know which group you belong to will be to see how your progress unfolds once your protocol is in place. There is no magic number/sweet spot that rings a bell and mandates an anastrozole prescription. How you feel, what your labs reflect, and the clinical experience of your doctor will determine the need for e2 intervention. This isn’t a religious or political debate, despite the tone that has developed when this subject is raised. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Side Effect Management
Seeking clarification from AI opponents
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top