ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
SARMs versus AAS: Different Side Effects?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BigTex" data-source="post: 222973" data-attributes="member: 43589"><p>I will give you my more anecdotal view of SARMS. I have a very close friend in China that is a biochemist so I was/am able to get some very good quality SARMS of all kinds since the early 2000's. I have read all of the supporting research on this stuff over the years and tried ALL of them. In all, I would have to say it would be a LONG SHOT to say any of them are worth trying. Compared to even low doses of anabolic steroids, SARMS are very weak to say the least. My wife seem to get a little bit out of Ostarine but only for a very short period of time, not even close to Anavar as they advertise. I seem to feel a little aggression using RAD 140 but that only lasted 1-2 workouts. I did not blood work using these but was definitely not impressed at all. Throw in the fact that they are WAY over priced here in the USA and I feel they are a complete waste of money. The only product that I feel has any value is the MK 677. That can be combined with GHRH's and GHRP's or even hGH to get some pretty good results. But again, it is way over priced.</p><p></p><p><strong><em><u>(either lacking human trials or sufficient evidence) ....</u></em></strong>seems quite a few of these products fall under this category. IMHO the cost of doing these + side effects far outweigh the benefits.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BigTex, post: 222973, member: 43589"] I will give you my more anecdotal view of SARMS. I have a very close friend in China that is a biochemist so I was/am able to get some very good quality SARMS of all kinds since the early 2000's. I have read all of the supporting research on this stuff over the years and tried ALL of them. In all, I would have to say it would be a LONG SHOT to say any of them are worth trying. Compared to even low doses of anabolic steroids, SARMS are very weak to say the least. My wife seem to get a little bit out of Ostarine but only for a very short period of time, not even close to Anavar as they advertise. I seem to feel a little aggression using RAD 140 but that only lasted 1-2 workouts. I did not blood work using these but was definitely not impressed at all. Throw in the fact that they are WAY over priced here in the USA and I feel they are a complete waste of money. The only product that I feel has any value is the MK 677. That can be combined with GHRH's and GHRP's or even hGH to get some pretty good results. But again, it is way over priced. [B][I][U](either lacking human trials or sufficient evidence) ....[/U][/I][/B]seems quite a few of these products fall under this category. IMHO the cost of doing these + side effects far outweigh the benefits. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
Clinical Use of Anabolics and Hormones
SARMs versus AAS: Different Side Effects?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top