ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Side Effect Management
Perplexing result.. thoughts?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="R2D2" data-source="post: 215988" data-attributes="member: 38143"><p>Just thinking more about this and acknowledging your point of Prop introducing noise in results, any thoughts on how I may be responding to Prop vs Enan from the above results?</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure whether it would be more sensible to reduce the Propionate by 50% to 1mg or reduce the Enanthate instead to maintain the 3:4 P:E ratio you previously opined as a target to try? For instance:</p><p></p><p>- Propionate: 3mg (so increase by 50%)</p><p>- Enanthate: 5mg (so decrease by 50%)</p><p>Total: 8mg / 6.09mg (excl. Ester) daily</p><p></p><p>(I'm currently on 8.86mg daily on current protocol - but a 40+ nmol/L result albeit short period, is quite worrying)</p><p></p><p>Alternatively, I could remove the Propionate entirely and dial-in Enanthate, as I'm not sure if the Propionate introduces 'too much variation' in my body. While it is difficult to tell because of the blend, my most recent results (14/01 - Trough AM result 20.1 vs 16/01 - Peak PM result 47.0) shows at least a 133% change between Peak and Trough. Surely this is not good, even if only for e.g. 3-5 hours?</p><p></p><p>While it is difficult to calculate a true average, my Nov '21 results on the same protocol as Jan '22, show that 4 hours after the peak Jan result, my peak reduces from 47 to 29.9 - so a substantial 85% drop, reducing the variation between Trough and somewhat tempered Peak to 36%, which you've mentioned is natural when consulting the research (and therefore acceptable). But that 133% range - ugh, can't be good.</p><p></p><p>Does this thinking pass your litmus test/analysis?</p><p></p><p>Opinion appreciated ahead of further experimentation!</p><p></p><p>Thanks</p><p>R2</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="R2D2, post: 215988, member: 38143"] Just thinking more about this and acknowledging your point of Prop introducing noise in results, any thoughts on how I may be responding to Prop vs Enan from the above results? I'm not sure whether it would be more sensible to reduce the Propionate by 50% to 1mg or reduce the Enanthate instead to maintain the 3:4 P:E ratio you previously opined as a target to try? For instance: - Propionate: 3mg (so increase by 50%) - Enanthate: 5mg (so decrease by 50%) Total: 8mg / 6.09mg (excl. Ester) daily (I'm currently on 8.86mg daily on current protocol - but a 40+ nmol/L result albeit short period, is quite worrying) Alternatively, I could remove the Propionate entirely and dial-in Enanthate, as I'm not sure if the Propionate introduces 'too much variation' in my body. While it is difficult to tell because of the blend, my most recent results (14/01 - Trough AM result 20.1 vs 16/01 - Peak PM result 47.0) shows at least a 133% change between Peak and Trough. Surely this is not good, even if only for e.g. 3-5 hours? While it is difficult to calculate a true average, my Nov '21 results on the same protocol as Jan '22, show that 4 hours after the peak Jan result, my peak reduces from 47 to 29.9 - so a substantial 85% drop, reducing the variation between Trough and somewhat tempered Peak to 36%, which you've mentioned is natural when consulting the research (and therefore acceptable). But that 133% range - ugh, can't be good. Does this thinking pass your litmus test/analysis? Opinion appreciated ahead of further experimentation! Thanks R2 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Side Effect Management
Perplexing result.. thoughts?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top