ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Side Effect Management
only happy when estradiol is VERY low
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MIP1950" data-source="post: 215370" data-attributes="member: 42988"><p>Prolactin: 7.1 ng/mL DHT: 58 ng/dL </p><p></p><p>The reality, or the reality I'm dealing with, is that E2 is the one variable and I have nothing to lose by experimenting. How else will I know? And I'm willing to go balls to the wall. And my doctor is curious about this, too, since he's never had a patient who did better when E2 was essentially, deliberately crashed with an ai. We both agree that the 'problems' are in the hypothalamus. Arginine, L-citrulline, boron, PDE-5 drugs all give me serious problems/side effects, so they're off the list. But, from the beginning of my testosterone journey, I've been afraid of an ai and maybe it has been the missing piece.</p><p></p><p>This a thread created by one guy, [USER=26057]@ggenovez[/USER], who only who only feels and functions well when his E2 is <5. Yes, absolutely against conventional wisdom, but this is the human body, so presumptions are just presumptions, even if the presumption was made by a doctor. As there are men who feel/function better with high E2, there equally have to be men who do better with rock bottom E2. Can't use logic because logic has left this realm. We could be in a quantum universe.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MIP1950, post: 215370, member: 42988"] Prolactin: 7.1 ng/mL DHT: 58 ng/dL The reality, or the reality I'm dealing with, is that E2 is the one variable and I have nothing to lose by experimenting. How else will I know? And I'm willing to go balls to the wall. And my doctor is curious about this, too, since he's never had a patient who did better when E2 was essentially, deliberately crashed with an ai. We both agree that the 'problems' are in the hypothalamus. Arginine, L-citrulline, boron, PDE-5 drugs all give me serious problems/side effects, so they're off the list. But, from the beginning of my testosterone journey, I've been afraid of an ai and maybe it has been the missing piece. This a thread created by one guy, [USER=26057]@ggenovez[/USER], who only who only feels and functions well when his E2 is <5. Yes, absolutely against conventional wisdom, but this is the human body, so presumptions are just presumptions, even if the presumption was made by a doctor. As there are men who feel/function better with high E2, there equally have to be men who do better with rock bottom E2. Can't use logic because logic has left this realm. We could be in a quantum universe. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Side Effect Management
only happy when estradiol is VERY low
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top