ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
New to Defy: Protocol and Supplies - Questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="johndoesmith" data-source="post: 69183" data-attributes="member: 13404"><p>1. You're not considering adhesion to the inside of the vial, so if it's filled to 5.6mL but you get out 5mL, then it has done it's job. </p><p></p><p>2. Proven, where? Simply saying it, isn't proof.</p><p></p><p>3. I don't see a significant difference. </p><p></p><p> [ATTACH]3507[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]3508[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]3509[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>4. I agree on that one. </p><p></p><p>5. Where? Also N=1. Gotta keep in mind that even measuring the previous dose incorrectly a tiny tiny bit will alter numbers, SHBG changes, other drugs that person is taking may change, and not to mention so many guys here change their protocol when they change their underwear. I wouldn't take that as proof that their testosterone is underdosed...</p><p></p><p>Almost all of what you've said is an opinion with anecdotes to support them, and you didn't even post any links to the "source" of this one guy who had different levels.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="johndoesmith, post: 69183, member: 13404"] 1. You're not considering adhesion to the inside of the vial, so if it's filled to 5.6mL but you get out 5mL, then it has done it's job. 2. Proven, where? Simply saying it, isn't proof. 3. I don't see a significant difference. [ATTACH=CONFIG]3507[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]3508[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=CONFIG]3509[/ATTACH] 4. I agree on that one. 5. Where? Also N=1. Gotta keep in mind that even measuring the previous dose incorrectly a tiny tiny bit will alter numbers, SHBG changes, other drugs that person is taking may change, and not to mention so many guys here change their protocol when they change their underwear. I wouldn't take that as proof that their testosterone is underdosed... Almost all of what you've said is an opinion with anecdotes to support them, and you didn't even post any links to the "source" of this one guy who had different levels. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
New to Defy: Protocol and Supplies - Questions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top