ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
New thoughts on AI
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="seb288" data-source="post: 146454" data-attributes="member: 38666"><p><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/core/lw/2.0/html/tileshop_pmc/tileshop_pmc_inline.html?title=Click%20on%20image%20to%20zoom&p=PMC3&id=2913038_zeg0081074820002.jpg" target="_blank">PubMed Central Image Viewer.</a></p><p></p><p>I prefer to use square root because its simpler and there's no unknown constants (whereas in that formula a and b are unknown, and it takes several blood tests and mathematical extrapolation to calculate a and b).</p><p></p><p>Also, do you even agree with their rectangular hyperbolae approximation? I don't even agree with it because it necessitates a maximum value for E, whereas I've found that E just keeps increasing, to the point that some Bodybuilders (using very high dose T) start growing breasts and even lactating when their T levels get high enough. Also men on high dose T cycles often prefer letro over aromasin, which can eliminate 98% of E - if E maxed out surely E would be increasing so slowly in the super high T range that it would be pointless to use arimidex or aromasin let alone requiring letrozole?</p><p></p><p>I've tried graphing it out with different levels for A and B, and B limits E2, unless we use a very high level B that can produce lactation, but in that case for therapeutic/natural T levels, E2 rise becomes almost linear, completely unlike the graph that I've linked you too. So I currently still disagree with the y=ax/b+x approximation. I think their T range was too small which led to their approximation.</p><p></p><p>According to my approximation, 20 is a good level of E2 of a T of 400, E2 of 25 is good for T of 625, 27 E2 good for 730 T, 30 E good for 900 T and 35 E good for 1225 T. Because a young healthy virile male displays T 900 - 730 and E 30 - 27, I like to peak at 900 (30E) and trough at 730 (27E).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="seb288, post: 146454, member: 38666"] [URL='https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/core/lw/2.0/html/tileshop_pmc/tileshop_pmc_inline.html?title=Click%20on%20image%20to%20zoom&p=PMC3&id=2913038_zeg0081074820002.jpg']PubMed Central Image Viewer.[/URL] I prefer to use square root because its simpler and there's no unknown constants (whereas in that formula a and b are unknown, and it takes several blood tests and mathematical extrapolation to calculate a and b). Also, do you even agree with their rectangular hyperbolae approximation? I don't even agree with it because it necessitates a maximum value for E, whereas I've found that E just keeps increasing, to the point that some Bodybuilders (using very high dose T) start growing breasts and even lactating when their T levels get high enough. Also men on high dose T cycles often prefer letro over aromasin, which can eliminate 98% of E - if E maxed out surely E would be increasing so slowly in the super high T range that it would be pointless to use arimidex or aromasin let alone requiring letrozole? I've tried graphing it out with different levels for A and B, and B limits E2, unless we use a very high level B that can produce lactation, but in that case for therapeutic/natural T levels, E2 rise becomes almost linear, completely unlike the graph that I've linked you too. So I currently still disagree with the y=ax/b+x approximation. I think their T range was too small which led to their approximation. According to my approximation, 20 is a good level of E2 of a T of 400, E2 of 25 is good for T of 625, 27 E2 good for 730 T, 30 E good for 900 T and 35 E good for 1225 T. Because a young healthy virile male displays T 900 - 730 and E 30 - 27, I like to peak at 900 (30E) and trough at 730 (27E). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
New thoughts on AI
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top