ExcelMale
Menu
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Videos
Lab Tests
Doctor Finder
Buy Books
About Us
Men’s Health Coaching
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
New thoughts on AI
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CoastWatcher" data-source="post: 138314" data-attributes="member: 2624"><p>Th use of an AI has never been universally advocated, nor has it ever been universally discouraged, at EM. In fact, this Forum probably had an earlier "anti-AI posture" (if you will) than certain other health communities; we certainly were more vocal in warning of the dangers of recklessly prescribing AIs than many, many doctors who ushered their patients into hormone hell by routinely walloping them with doses of anastrozole more appropriate for women fighting breast cancer.</p><p></p><p>It has certainly been prescribed too often - and an honest doctor who knows how to manage androgen replacement will acknowledge that. At the same time, anastrozole is a good, often necessary, drug that plays an important role in many, many protocols. Those who argue for unrestricted estradiol levels are no more responsible in their approach than those who initiate a TRT protocol with a large dose of anastrozole.</p><p></p><p>Why the advocates of the former have made this a personal - at times, highly unpleasant - battle is beyond me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CoastWatcher, post: 138314, member: 2624"] Th use of an AI has never been universally advocated, nor has it ever been universally discouraged, at EM. In fact, this Forum probably had an earlier "anti-AI posture" (if you will) than certain other health communities; we certainly were more vocal in warning of the dangers of recklessly prescribing AIs than many, many doctors who ushered their patients into hormone hell by routinely walloping them with doses of anastrozole more appropriate for women fighting breast cancer. It has certainly been prescribed too often - and an honest doctor who knows how to manage androgen replacement will acknowledge that. At the same time, anastrozole is a good, often necessary, drug that plays an important role in many, many protocols. Those who argue for unrestricted estradiol levels are no more responsible in their approach than those who initiate a TRT protocol with a large dose of anastrozole. Why the advocates of the former have made this a personal - at times, highly unpleasant - battle is beyond me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Share this page
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Sponsors
Forums
Testosterone Replacement, Low T, HCG, & Beyond
Testosterone Basics & Questions
New thoughts on AI
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top